lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [May]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/3] regulator: qcom_spmi: Add support for PM8005
On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 05:16:06PM -0600, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
> On 5/21/2019 12:50 PM, Mark Brown wrote:

> > > +static int spmi_regulator_common_list_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
> > > + unsigned selector);
> > > +
> > > +static int spmi_regulator_common2_set_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
> > > + unsigned selector)

> > Eeew, can we not have better names?

> I'm open to suggestions. Apparently there are two register common register
> schemes - the old one and the new one. PMIC designs after some random point
> in time are all the new register scheme per the documentation I see.

> As far as I an aware, the FT426 design is the first design to be added to
> this driver to make use of the new scheme, but I expect more to be supported
> in future, thus I'm reluctant to make these ft426 specific in the name.

If there's a completely new register map why are these even in the same
driver?

> > > + if (reg == SPMI_COMMON2_MODE_HPM_MASK)
> > > + return REGULATOR_MODE_NORMAL;
> > > +
> > > + if (reg == SPMI_COMMON2_MODE_AUTO_MASK)
> > > + return REGULATOR_MODE_FAST;
> > > +
> > > + return REGULATOR_MODE_IDLE;
> > > +}

> > This looks like you want to write a switch statement.

> It follows the existing style in the driver, but sure I can make this a
> switch.

Please fix the rest of the driver as well then.
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-05-22 13:02    [W:0.166 / U:42.480 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site