[lkml]   [2019]   [May]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/7] introduce cpu.headroom knob to cpu controller
Hello Song.

On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 07:43:35PM +0000, Song Liu <> wrote:
> The load level above is measured as requests-per-second.
> When there is no side workload, the system has about 45% busy CPU with
> load level of 1.0; and about 75% busy CPU at load level of 1.5.
> The saturation starts before the system hitting 100% utilization. This is
> true for many different resources: ALUs in SMT systems, cache lines,
> memory bandwidths, etc.
I have read through the thread continuation and it appears to me there
is some misunderstanding on the latency metric (scheduler latency <=
your latency <= request wall time?).

Could you please describe how is the latency that you report defined and


[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-05-21 15:47    [W:0.101 / U:3.832 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site