lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [May]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH 5.1 127/128] ext4: unsigned int compared against zero
Date
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>

commit fbbbbd2f28aec991f3fbc248df211550fbdfd58c upstream.

There are two cases where u32 variables n and err are being checked
for less than zero error values, the checks is always false because
the variables are not signed. Fix this by making the variables ints.

Addresses-Coverity: ("Unsigned compared against 0")
Fixes: 345c0dbf3a30 ("ext4: protect journal inode's blocks using block_validity")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
fs/ext4/block_validity.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/fs/ext4/block_validity.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/block_validity.c
@@ -142,7 +142,8 @@ static int ext4_protect_reserved_inode(s
struct inode *inode;
struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(sb);
struct ext4_map_blocks map;
- u32 i = 0, err = 0, num, n;
+ u32 i = 0, num;
+ int err = 0, n;

if ((ino < EXT4_ROOT_INO) ||
(ino > le32_to_cpu(sbi->s_es->s_inodes_count)))

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-05-20 14:37    [W:0.380 / U:2.868 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site