lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [May]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] mfd: stmfx: Fix macro definition spelling
On Tue, 14 May 2019, Nathan Chancellor wrote:

> On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 08:30:59AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, 10 May 2019, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> >
> > > Clang warns:
> > >
> > > In file included from drivers/mfd/stmfx.c:13:
> > > include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h:7:9: warning: 'MFD_STMFX_H' is used as a
> > > header guard here, followed by #define of a different macro
> > > [-Wheader-guard]
> > >
> > > Fixes: 06252ade9156 ("mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core driver")
> > > Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/475
> > > Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > > include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h | 2 +-
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > Applied, thanks.
> >
>
> Hi Lee,
>
> Thanks for picking it up. It seems this didn't make it into your MFD
> pull request for 5.2, was that intentional? It would be nice to avoid
> this warning.

Hmm... no it was not intentional. Not sure what happened there.

I will pick it up for the -rcs.

--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-05-14 20:54    [W:0.050 / U:1.008 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site