lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [May]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v8 2/6] virtio-pmem: Add virtio pmem driver

Hi David,

Thank you for the review.

> On 10.05.19 17:51, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
> > This patch adds virtio-pmem driver for KVM guest.
> >
> > Guest reads the persistent memory range information from
> > Qemu over VIRTIO and registers it on nvdimm_bus. It also
> > creates a nd_region object with the persistent memory
> > range information so that existing 'nvdimm/pmem' driver
> > can reserve this into system memory map. This way
> > 'virtio-pmem' driver uses existing functionality of pmem
> > driver to register persistent memory compatible for DAX
> > capable filesystems.
> >
> > This also provides function to perform guest flush over
> > VIRTIO from 'pmem' driver when userspace performs flush
> > on DAX memory range.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pankaj Gupta <pagupta@redhat.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Yuval Shaia <yuval.shaia@oracle.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/nvdimm/Makefile | 1 +
> > drivers/nvdimm/nd_virtio.c | 129 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/nvdimm/virtio_pmem.c | 117 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/virtio/Kconfig | 10 +++
> > include/linux/virtio_pmem.h | 60 ++++++++++++++
> > include/uapi/linux/virtio_ids.h | 1 +
> > include/uapi/linux/virtio_pmem.h | 10 +++
> > 7 files changed, 328 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 drivers/nvdimm/nd_virtio.c
> > create mode 100644 drivers/nvdimm/virtio_pmem.c
> > create mode 100644 include/linux/virtio_pmem.h
> > create mode 100644 include/uapi/linux/virtio_pmem.h
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/Makefile b/drivers/nvdimm/Makefile
> > index 6f2a088afad6..cefe233e0b52 100644
> > --- a/drivers/nvdimm/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/Makefile
> > @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ND_BTT) += nd_btt.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_ND_BLK) += nd_blk.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_X86_PMEM_LEGACY) += nd_e820.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_OF_PMEM) += of_pmem.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_VIRTIO_PMEM) += virtio_pmem.o nd_virtio.o
> >
> > nd_pmem-y := pmem.o
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/nd_virtio.c b/drivers/nvdimm/nd_virtio.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..ed7ddcc5a62c
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/nd_virtio.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,129 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +/*
> > + * virtio_pmem.c: Virtio pmem Driver
> > + *
> > + * Discovers persistent memory range information
> > + * from host and provides a virtio based flushing
> > + * interface.
> > + */
> > +#include <linux/virtio_pmem.h>
> > +#include "nd.h"
> > +
> > + /* The interrupt handler */
> > +void host_ack(struct virtqueue *vq)
> > +{
> > + unsigned int len;
> > + unsigned long flags;
> > + struct virtio_pmem_request *req, *req_buf;
> > + struct virtio_pmem *vpmem = vq->vdev->priv;
>
> Nit: use reverse Christmas tree layout :)

o.k

>
> > +
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&vpmem->pmem_lock, flags);
> > + while ((req = virtqueue_get_buf(vq, &len)) != NULL) {
> > + req->done = true;
> > + wake_up(&req->host_acked);
> > +
> > + if (!list_empty(&vpmem->req_list)) {
> > + req_buf = list_first_entry(&vpmem->req_list,
> > + struct virtio_pmem_request, list);
> > + req_buf->wq_buf_avail = true;
> > + wake_up(&req_buf->wq_buf);
> > + list_del(&req_buf->list);
> > + }
> > + }
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vpmem->pmem_lock, flags);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(host_ack);
> > +
> > + /* The request submission function */
> > +int virtio_pmem_flush(struct nd_region *nd_region)
> > +{
> > + int err, err1;
> > + unsigned long flags;
> > + struct scatterlist *sgs[2], sg, ret;
> > + struct virtio_device *vdev = nd_region->provider_data;
> > + struct virtio_pmem *vpmem = vdev->priv;
> > + struct virtio_pmem_request *req;
>
> Nit: use reverse Christmas tree layout :)

o.k

>
> > +
> > + might_sleep();
> > + req = kmalloc(sizeof(*req), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!req)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + req->done = false;
> > + strcpy(req->name, "FLUSH");
> > + init_waitqueue_head(&req->host_acked);
> > + init_waitqueue_head(&req->wq_buf);
> > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&req->list);
> > + sg_init_one(&sg, req->name, strlen(req->name));
> > + sgs[0] = &sg;
> > + sg_init_one(&ret, &req->ret, sizeof(req->ret));
> > + sgs[1] = &ret;
> > +
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&vpmem->pmem_lock, flags);
> > + /*
> > + * If virtqueue_add_sgs returns -ENOSPC then req_vq virtual
> > + * queue does not have free descriptor. We add the request
> > + * to req_list and wait for host_ack to wake us up when free
> > + * slots are available.
> > + */
> > + while ((err = virtqueue_add_sgs(vpmem->req_vq, sgs, 1, 1, req,
> > + GFP_ATOMIC)) == -ENOSPC) {
> > +
> > + dev_err(&vdev->dev, "failed to send command to virtio pmem"\
> > + "device, no free slots in the virtqueue\n");
> > + req->wq_buf_avail = false;
> > + list_add_tail(&req->list, &vpmem->req_list);
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vpmem->pmem_lock, flags);
> > +
> > + /* When host has read buffer, this completes via host_ack */
>
> "A host repsonse results in "host_ack" getting called" ... ?

o.k

>
> > + wait_event(req->wq_buf, req->wq_buf_avail);
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&vpmem->pmem_lock, flags);
> > + }
> > + err1 = virtqueue_kick(vpmem->req_vq);
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vpmem->pmem_lock, flags);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * virtqueue_add_sgs failed with error different than -ENOSPC, we can't
> > + * do anything about that.
> > + */
> > + if (err || !err1) {
> > + dev_info(&vdev->dev, "failed to send command to virtio pmem device\n");
> > + err = -EIO;
> > + goto ret;
>
> Avoid the goto. Just move the following statements into an "else" case.

o.k

>
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* When host has read buffer, this completes via host_ack */
>
> "A host repsonse results in "host_ack" getting called" ... ?
>
> > + wait_event(req->host_acked, req->done);
> > + err = req->ret;
> > +ret:
> > + kfree(req);
> > + return err;
> > +};
> > +
> > +/* The asynchronous flush callback function */
> > +int async_pmem_flush(struct nd_region *nd_region, struct bio *bio)
> > +{
> > + int rc = 0;
> > +
> > + /* Create child bio for asynchronous flush and chain with
> > + * parent bio. Otherwise directly call nd_region flush.
> > + */
> > + if (bio && bio->bi_iter.bi_sector != -1) {
> > + struct bio *child = bio_alloc(GFP_ATOMIC, 0);
> > +
> > + if (!child)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > + bio_copy_dev(child, bio);
> > + child->bi_opf = REQ_PREFLUSH;
> > + child->bi_iter.bi_sector = -1;
> > + bio_chain(child, bio);
> > + submit_bio(child);
>
> return 0;
>
> Then, drop the "else" case and "int rc" and do directly
>
> if (virtio_pmem_flush(nd_region))
> return -EIO;

and another 'return 0' here :)

I don't like return from multiple places instead I prefer
single exit point from function.

>
> > + } else {
> > +
> > + rc = -EIO;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return rc;
> > +};
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(async_pmem_flush);
> > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> > diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/virtio_pmem.c b/drivers/nvdimm/virtio_pmem.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..cfc6381c4e5d
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/virtio_pmem.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +/*
> > + * virtio_pmem.c: Virtio pmem Driver
> > + *
> > + * Discovers persistent memory range information
> > + * from host and registers the virtual pmem device
> > + * with libnvdimm core.
> > + */
> > +#include <linux/virtio_pmem.h>
> > +#include "nd.h"
> > +
> > +static struct virtio_device_id id_table[] = {
> > + { VIRTIO_ID_PMEM, VIRTIO_DEV_ANY_ID },
> > + { 0 },
> > +};
> > +
> > + /* Initialize virt queue */
> > +static int init_vq(struct virtio_pmem *vpmem)
> > +{
> > + /* single vq */
> > + vpmem->req_vq = virtio_find_single_vq(vpmem->vdev,
> > + host_ack, "flush_queue");
>
> Nit: Wrong indentation of parameters.

o.k

>
> > + if (IS_ERR(vpmem->req_vq))
> > + return PTR_ERR(vpmem->req_vq);
> > +
> > + spin_lock_init(&vpmem->pmem_lock);
> > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vpmem->req_list);
>
> I would initialize the locks in the virtio_pmem_probe() directly,
> earlier (directly after allocating vpmem).

Since the lock is to protect the vq so logically I put it in 'init_vq'
which is eventually called by probe.

>
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int virtio_pmem_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> > +{
> > + int err = 0;
> > + struct resource res;
> > + struct virtio_pmem *vpmem;
> > + struct nd_region_desc ndr_desc = {};
> > + int nid = dev_to_node(&vdev->dev);
> > + struct nd_region *nd_region;
>
> Nit: use reverse Christmas tree layout :)

Done.

>
> > +
> > + if (!vdev->config->get) {
> > + dev_err(&vdev->dev, "%s failure: config access disabled\n",
> > + __func__);
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + vpmem = devm_kzalloc(&vdev->dev, sizeof(*vpmem), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!vpmem) {
> > + err = -ENOMEM;
> > + goto out_err;
> > + }
> > +
> > + vpmem->vdev = vdev;
> > + vdev->priv = vpmem;
> > + err = init_vq(vpmem);
> > + if (err)
> > + goto out_err;
> > +
> > + virtio_cread(vpmem->vdev, struct virtio_pmem_config,
> > + start, &vpmem->start);
> > + virtio_cread(vpmem->vdev, struct virtio_pmem_config,
> > + size, &vpmem->size);
> > +
> > + res.start = vpmem->start;
> > + res.end = vpmem->start + vpmem->size-1;
> > + vpmem->nd_desc.provider_name = "virtio-pmem";
> > + vpmem->nd_desc.module = THIS_MODULE;
> > +
> > + vpmem->nvdimm_bus = nvdimm_bus_register(&vdev->dev,
> > + &vpmem->nd_desc);
> > + if (!vpmem->nvdimm_bus)
> > + goto out_vq;
> > +
> > + dev_set_drvdata(&vdev->dev, vpmem->nvdimm_bus);
> > +
> > + ndr_desc.res = &res;
> > + ndr_desc.numa_node = nid;
> > + ndr_desc.flush = async_pmem_flush;
> > + set_bit(ND_REGION_PAGEMAP, &ndr_desc.flags);
> > + set_bit(ND_REGION_ASYNC, &ndr_desc.flags);
> > + nd_region = nvdimm_pmem_region_create(vpmem->nvdimm_bus, &ndr_desc);
> > +
>
> I'd drop this empty line.

hmm.

>
> > + if (!nd_region)
> > + goto out_nd;
> > + nd_region->provider_data = dev_to_virtio(nd_region->dev.parent->parent);
>
> Does it make sense to move some parts into separate functions for
> readability? E.g., virtio_pmem_init_nvdimm_bus()

I think this function only has initialization and don't have any complex logic.

>
> > + return 0;
> > +out_nd:
> > + err = -ENXIO;
>
> I'd always initialize "err" along with the goto statement for
> readability, especially because ...
>
> > + nvdimm_bus_unregister(vpmem->nvdimm_bus);
> > +out_vq:
>
> ... you don't initialize err in this case. Err is here 0 if I am not wrong.

Right. Changed.

>
> > + vdev->config->del_vqs(vdev);
> > +out_err:
> > + dev_err(&vdev->dev, "failed to register virtio pmem memory\n");
>
> Should we try to give more meaning full messages? I can think of
> scenarios like "memory region is not properly aligned" or "out of memory".

o.k

>
> > + return err;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void virtio_pmem_remove(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> > +{
> > + struct nvdimm_bus *nvdimm_bus = dev_get_drvdata(&vdev->dev);
> > +
>
> Is the nd_region implicitly cleaned up?

yes. it will be.

>
> You are not freeing "vdev->priv".

vdev->priv is vpmem which is allocated using devm API.
>
> > + nvdimm_bus_unregister(nvdimm_bus);
> > + vdev->config->del_vqs(vdev);
> > + vdev->config->reset(vdev);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static struct virtio_driver virtio_pmem_driver = {
> > + .driver.name = KBUILD_MODNAME,
> > + .driver.owner = THIS_MODULE,
> > + .id_table = id_table,
> > + .probe = virtio_pmem_probe,
> > + .remove = virtio_pmem_remove,
> > +};
> > +
> > +module_virtio_driver(virtio_pmem_driver);
> > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(virtio, id_table);
> > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Virtio pmem driver");
> > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/Kconfig b/drivers/virtio/Kconfig
> > index 35897649c24f..9f634a2ed638 100644
> > --- a/drivers/virtio/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/virtio/Kconfig
> > @@ -42,6 +42,16 @@ config VIRTIO_PCI_LEGACY
> >
> > If unsure, say Y.
> >
> > +config VIRTIO_PMEM
> > + tristate "Support for virtio pmem driver"
> > + depends on VIRTIO
> > + depends on LIBNVDIMM
> > + help
> > + This driver provides support for virtio based flushing interface
> > + for persistent memory range.
>
> "This driver provides access to virtio-pmem devices, storage devices
> that are mapped into the physical address space - similar to NVDIMMs -
> with a virtio-based flushing interface." ... ?

looks better. Incorporated.

Thanks,
Pankaj
>
> > +
> > + If unsure, say M.
> > +
>
>
> --
>
> Thanks,
>
> David / dhildenb
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-05-14 11:28    [W:0.092 / U:2.268 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site