lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Apr]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH 3/4] f2fs: fix race between online resize path and allocate new data block path
Date
There can be a potential race between allocate_segment_for_resize() and
allocate_data_block(), resulting into two issues -

1. The allocate_data_block() can get a data block from a segment which
is currently being resized. This results in data being updated in an
outdated or already resized segment.

2. It also results into these warnings from get_new_segment():
f2fs_bug_on(sbi, secno >= NEW_MAIN_SECS(sbi));

Fix these by using curseg_mutex lock in the resize context to prevent
race with allocate_data_block() path.

Signed-off-by: Sahitya Tummala <stummala@codeaurora.org>
---
fs/f2fs/segment.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
index 1c3cc30..e7c411f 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
@@ -2643,12 +2643,14 @@ void allocate_segment_for_resize(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int type)
struct curseg_info *curseg = CURSEG_I(sbi, type);
unsigned int old_segno = curseg->segno;

+ mutex_lock(&curseg->curseg_mutex);
if (f2fs_need_SSR(sbi) && get_ssr_segment(sbi, type))
change_curseg(sbi, type);
else
new_curseg(sbi, type, true);

stat_inc_seg_type(sbi, curseg);
+ mutex_unlock(&curseg->curseg_mutex);

if (get_valid_blocks(sbi, old_segno, false) == 0)
__set_test_and_free(sbi, old_segno);
--
Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-04-09 12:37    [W:0.029 / U:1.844 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site