lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Apr]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/3] arm64: kdump: support reserving crashkernel above 4G
From
Date

Hi Mike,

On 2019/4/4 22:46, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 11:05:44AM +0800, Chen Zhou wrote:
>> When crashkernel is reserved above 4G in memory, kernel should
>> reserve some amount of low memory for swiotlb and some DMA buffers.
>>
>> Kernel would try to allocate at least 256M below 4G automatically
>> as x86_64 if crashkernel is above 4G. Meanwhile, support
>> crashkernel=X,[high,low] in arm64.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chen Zhou <chenzhou10@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c | 3 ++
>> arch/arm64/mm/init.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>> 2 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
>> index 413d566..82cd9a0 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
>> @@ -243,6 +243,9 @@ static void __init request_standard_resources(void)
>> request_resource(res, &kernel_data);
>> #ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE
>> /* Userspace will find "Crash kernel" region in /proc/iomem. */
>> + if (crashk_low_res.end && crashk_low_res.start >= res->start &&
>> + crashk_low_res.end <= res->end)
>> + request_resource(res, &crashk_low_res);
>> if (crashk_res.end && crashk_res.start >= res->start &&
>> crashk_res.end <= res->end)
>> request_resource(res, &crashk_res);
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
>> index 6bc1350..ceb2a25 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
>> @@ -64,6 +64,57 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(memstart_addr);
>> phys_addr_t arm64_dma_phys_limit __ro_after_init;
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE
>> +static int __init reserve_crashkernel_low(void)
>> +{
>> + unsigned long long base, low_base = 0, low_size = 0;
>> + unsigned long total_low_mem;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + total_low_mem = memblock_mem_size(1UL << (32 - PAGE_SHIFT));
>> +
>> + /* crashkernel=Y,low */
>> + ret = parse_crashkernel_low(boot_command_line, total_low_mem, &low_size, &base);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + /*
>> + * two parts from lib/swiotlb.c:
>> + * -swiotlb size: user-specified with swiotlb= or default.
>> + *
>> + * -swiotlb overflow buffer: now hardcoded to 32k. We round it
>> + * to 8M for other buffers that may need to stay low too. Also
>> + * make sure we allocate enough extra low memory so that we
>> + * don't run out of DMA buffers for 32-bit devices.
>> + */
>> + low_size = max(swiotlb_size_or_default() + (8UL << 20), 256UL << 20);
>> + } else {
>> + /* passed with crashkernel=0,low ? */
>> + if (!low_size)
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>> +
>> + low_base = memblock_find_in_range(0, 1ULL << 32, low_size, SZ_2M);
>> + if (!low_base) {
>> + pr_err("Cannot reserve %ldMB crashkernel low memory, please try smaller size.\n",
>> + (unsigned long)(low_size >> 20));
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = memblock_reserve(low_base, low_size);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + pr_err("%s: Error reserving crashkernel low memblock.\n", __func__);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + pr_info("Reserving %ldMB of low memory at %ldMB for crashkernel (System RAM: %ldMB)\n",
>> + (unsigned long)(low_size >> 20),
>> + (unsigned long)(low_base >> 20),
>> + (unsigned long)(total_low_mem >> 20));
>> +
>> + crashk_low_res.start = low_base;
>> + crashk_low_res.end = low_base + low_size - 1;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> /*
>> * reserve_crashkernel() - reserves memory for crash kernel
>> *
>> @@ -74,19 +125,28 @@ phys_addr_t arm64_dma_phys_limit __ro_after_init;
>> static void __init reserve_crashkernel(void)
>> {
>> unsigned long long crash_base, crash_size;
>> + bool high = false;
>> int ret;
>>
>> ret = parse_crashkernel(boot_command_line, memblock_phys_mem_size(),
>> &crash_size, &crash_base);
>> /* no crashkernel= or invalid value specified */
>> - if (ret || !crash_size)
>> - return;
>> + if (ret || !crash_size) {
>> + /* crashkernel=X,high */
>> + ret = parse_crashkernel_high(boot_command_line, memblock_phys_mem_size(),
>> + &crash_size, &crash_base);
>> + if (ret || !crash_size)
>> + return;
>> + high = true;
>> + }
>>
>> crash_size = PAGE_ALIGN(crash_size);
>>
>> if (crash_base == 0) {
>> /* Current arm64 boot protocol requires 2MB alignment */
>> - crash_base = memblock_find_in_range(0, ARCH_LOW_ADDRESS_LIMIT,
>> + crash_base = memblock_find_in_range(0,
>> + high ? memblock_end_of_DRAM()
>> + : ARCH_LOW_ADDRESS_LIMIT,
>> crash_size, SZ_2M);
>> if (crash_base == 0) {
>> pr_warn("cannot allocate crashkernel (size:0x%llx)\n",
>> @@ -112,6 +172,11 @@ static void __init reserve_crashkernel(void)
>> }
>> memblock_reserve(crash_base, crash_size);
>>
>> + if (crash_base >= SZ_4G && reserve_crashkernel_low()) {
>> + memblock_free(crash_base, crash_size);
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>
> This very reminds what x86 does. Any chance some of the code can be reused
> rather than duplicated?

As i said in the comment, i transport reserve_crashkernel_low() from x86_64. There are minor
differences. In arm64, we don't need to do insert_resource(), we do request_resource()
in request_standard_resources() later.

How about doing like this:

move common reserve_crashkernel_low() code into kernel/kexec_core.c.
and do in x86 like this:
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
@@ -573,9 +573,12 @@ static void __init reserve_crashkernel(void)
return;
}

- if (crash_base >= (1ULL << 32) && reserve_crashkernel_low()) {
- memblock_free(crash_base, crash_size);
- return;
+ if (crash_base >= (1ULL << 32)) {
+ if (reserve_crashkernel_low()) {
+ memblock_free(crash_base, crash_size);
+ return;
+ } else
+ insert_resource(&iomem_resource, &crashk_low_res);
}

>
>> pr_info("crashkernel reserved: 0x%016llx - 0x%016llx (%lld MB)\n",
>> crash_base, crash_base + crash_size, crash_size >> 20);
>>
>> --
>> 2.7.4
>>
>
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-04-05 05:04    [W:0.044 / U:2.796 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site