lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Apr]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] x86/microcode: Refactor Intel microcode loading
On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 06:31:37PM +0200, Jann Horn wrote:
> Uuuh. I *definitely* tested this. I ran this yesterday evening on my
> home machine, on top of commit
> 14c741de93861749dfb60b4964028541f5c506ca from Linus' tree, plus two
> cherry-picked fixes for drm/ttm. I specifically made sure that I had
> the old microcode version before reloading these ways and I had the
> new version after reloading. And the verbose dmesg logs also looked
> okay.

How did you check the microcode revision before and after? /proc/cpuinfo?

Because that old method doesn't say anything in dmesg if there's no
debugging output, only the iucode_tool says something like the below if
you enable verbose output:

# iucode-tool -v --kernel=/dev/cpu/microcode /lib/firmware/intel-ucode/06-3a-09
iucode-tool: processed 1 valid microcode(s), 1 signature(s), 1 unique signature(s)
iucode-tool: selected 1 microcode(s), 1 signature(s)
iucode-tool: Uploading selected microcodes to: /dev/cpu/microcode
iucode-tool: /dev/cpu/microcode: 1 microcode entries uploaded, 13312 bytes

--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-04-04 18:48    [W:0.040 / U:8.560 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site