lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Apr]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] proc/sysctl: add shared variables for range check
On Wed, 17 Apr 2019 02:59:43 +0200 Matteo Croce <mcroce@redhat.com> wrote:

> In the sysctl code the proc_dointvec_minmax() function is often used to
> validate the user supplied value between an allowed range. This function
> uses the extra1 and extra2 members from struct ctl_table as minimum and
> maximum allowed value.
>
> On sysctl handler declaration, in every source file there are some readonly
> variables containing just an integer which address is assigned to the
> extra1 and extra2 members, so the sysctl range is enforced.
>
> The special values 0, 1 and INT_MAX are very often used as range boundary,
> leading duplication of variables like zero=0, one=1, int_max=INT_MAX in
> different source files:
>
> $ git grep -E '\.extra[12].*&(zero|one|int_max)\b' |wc -l
> 245
>
> This patch adds three const variables for the most commonly used values,
> and use them instead of creating a local one for every object file.
>

Nice. A few thoughts:

> --- a/arch/s390/appldata/appldata_base.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/appldata/appldata_base.c
> @@ -220,15 +220,13 @@ appldata_timer_handler(struct ctl_table *ctl, int write,
> void __user *buffer, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos)
> {
> int timer_active = appldata_timer_active;
> - int zero = 0;
> - int one = 1;
> int rc;
> struct ctl_table ctl_entry = {
> .procname = ctl->procname,
> .data = &timer_active,
> .maxlen = sizeof(int),
> - .extra1 = &zero,
> - .extra2 = &one,
> + .extra1 = (void *)&sysctl_zero,
> + .extra2 = (void *)&sysctl_one,

The casts are ugly, and by casting away constness they introduce the
risk that some errant could could change the value of 0, 1 and INT_MAX!
Maybe - perhaps trying to do that would cause a segv but still,
they're ugly.

A proper fix would require changing extra1 and extra2 to const void *.
Perhaps that would be unfeasibly extensive?

> ...
>
> --- a/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c
> @@ -21,6 +21,11 @@ static const struct inode_operations proc_sys_inode_operations;
> static const struct file_operations proc_sys_dir_file_operations;
> static const struct inode_operations proc_sys_dir_operations;
>
> +/* shared constants to be used in various sysctls */
> +const int sysctl_zero = 0;
> +const int sysctl_one = 1;
> +const int sysctl_int_max = INT_MAX;

Don't these require EXPORT_SYMBOL()?


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-04-17 05:18    [W:0.073 / U:3.956 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site