lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Apr]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] mtd: rawnand: mark expected switch fall-throughs
Hi Gustavo,

"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com> wrote on Thu, 11 Apr
2019 13:30:31 -0500:

> Hi Miquel,
>
> On 2/5/19 6:55 AM, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> [..]
> >> @@ -3280,12 +3280,14 @@ static void onenand_check_features(struct mtd_info *mtd)
> >> if ((this->version_id & 0xf) == 0xe)
> >> this->options |= ONENAND_HAS_NOP_1;
> >> }
> >> + /* fall through */
> >>
> >> case ONENAND_DEVICE_DENSITY_2Gb:
> >> /* 2Gb DDP does not have 2 plane */
> >> if (!ONENAND_IS_DDP(this))
> >> this->options |= ONENAND_HAS_2PLANE;
> >> this->options |= ONENAND_HAS_UNLOCK_ALL;
> >> + /* fall through */
> >
> > This looks strange.
> >
> > In ONENAND_DEVICE_DENSITY_2Gb:
> > ONENAND_HAS_UNLOCK_ALL is set unconditionally.
> >
> > But then, under ONENAND_DEVICE_DENSITY_1Gb, the same option is set only
> > if process is evaluated to true.
> >
> > Same problem with ONENAND_HAS_2PLANE:
> > - it is set in ONENAND_DEVICE_DENSITY_4Gb only if ONENAND_IS_DDP()
> > - it is unset in ONENAND_DEVICE_DENSITY_2Gb only if !ONENAND_IS_DDP()
> >
> > Maybe this portion should be reworked because I am unsure if this is a
> > missing fall through or a bug.
> >
>
> I wonder if you had the chance to take a look into this piece of code.
>
> Thanks
> --
> Gustavo

What do you mean?


Thanks,
Miquèl

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-04-12 00:10    [W:0.093 / U:8.040 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site