[lkml]   [2019]   [Apr]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 5/5] Lib: sort.h: replace int size with size_t size in the swap function
On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 09:56:07AM +0000, George Spelvin wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 at 12:35:55 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > Hmm... If (*swap)() is called recursively it means the change might increase
> > stack usage on 64-bit platforms.
> >
> > Am I missing something?
> Under what conceivable circumstance would someone write a recursive
> (*swap)() function?
> You're technically right, but the precondition is more fantastical
> than "if the U.K.'s parliament get their shit together before the
> 12th", so I have a hard time worrying about it.
> But you did make me think of something: the whole reason swap()
> takes a size argument is for the benefit of the (no longer existing)
> generic swap functions. All of the custom swap functions ignore
> it.
> So how about *deleting* the parameter instead? That simplifies
> everything.

I like this idea!

With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

 \ /
  Last update: 2019-04-01 12:29    [W:0.052 / U:4.724 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site