lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Mar]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 03/27] Enforce module signatures if the kernel is locked down
On Fri, 8 Mar 2019, Matthew Garrett wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 3:00 PM James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 6 Mar 2019, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> >
> > > From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
> > >
> > > If the kernel is locked down, require that all modules have valid
> > > signatures that we can verify.
> >
> > Perhaps note that this won't cover the case where folk are using DM-Verity
> > with a signed root hash for verifying kernel modules.
>
> Mm. I can't see a terribly good way of doing this generically -
> loadpin gives no indication to the module loading code that it comes
> from a trusted source. Would making the lockdown/module signature
> enforcement a separate config option be reasonable?

I was just suggest documenting this.

--
James Morris
<jmorris@namei.org>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-03-09 05:47    [W:0.048 / U:1.216 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site