[lkml]   [2019]   [Mar]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/3] scripts/ima: define a set of common functions
On 02/28/19 at 10:05am, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> Hi Dave,
> On Thu, 2019-02-28 at 21:41 +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> > Hi Mimi,
> >
> > Sorry for jumping in late, just noticed this kexec selftests, I think we
> > also need a kexec load test not only for ima, but for general kexec
> The IMA kselftest tests are for the coordination between the different
> methods of verifying file signatures.  In particular, for the kexec
> kernel image and kernel module signatures.
> The initial IMA kselftest just verifies that in an environment
> requiring signed kexec kernel images, the kexec_load syscall fails. 
> This week I posted additional IMA kselftests[1][2], including one for
> the kexec_file_load syscall.  I would really appreciate these
> kselftests being reviewed/acked.
> Mimi
> [1] Subject: [PATCH v2 0/5] selftests/ima: add kexec and kernel module tests
> [2] Patches available from the "next-queued-testing" branch

Hi Mimi,

Still did not get change to have a look at V2, but seems you missed the
last chunk of comments about the secure boot mode in previous reply?

I just copy it hear:
Do you want to get the Secureboot status here?
I got some advice from Peter Jones previously, thus we have below
in our kdump scripts:

See the function is_secure_boot_enforced(), probably you can refer to
that function and check setup mode as well.


 \ /
  Last update: 2019-03-08 03:45    [W:0.157 / U:0.008 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site