[lkml]   [2019]   [Mar]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PULL REQUEST] Kernel lockdown patches for 5.2
On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 7:56 PM Mimi Zohar <> wrote:
> The kexec and kernel modules patches in this patch set continues to
> ignore IMA. This patch set should up front either provide an
> alternative solution to coordinate the different signature
> verification methods or rely on the architecture specific policy for
> that coordination.

Hi Mimi,

I'm working on a patch for this at the moment which can then be added
to either patchset. Is there a tree that contains the proposed Power
architecture policy? I want to make sure I don't accidentally end up
depending on anything x86.

 \ /
  Last update: 2019-03-07 05:25    [W:0.377 / U:2.264 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site