[lkml]   [2019]   [Mar]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RESEND v2] soc: imx: Add generic i.MX8 SoC driver
On Fri, 2019-03-22 at 16:49 +0000, Abel Vesa wrote:
> Add generic i.MX8 SoC driver along with the i.MX8MQ SoC specific code.
> For now, only i.MX8MQ revision B1 is supported. For any other, i.MX8MQ
> revision it will print 'unknown'.

> +#define REV_B1 0x21
> +
> +#define IMX8MQ_SW_INFO_B1 0x40
> +#define IMX8MQ_SW_MAGIC_B1 0xff0055aa
> +
> + np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "fsl,imx8mq-ocotp");+
> + ocotp_base = of_iomap(np, 0);
> +
> + magic = readl_relaxed(ocotp_base + IMX8MQ_SW_INFO_B1);
> + if (magic == IMX8MQ_SW_MAGIC_B1)
> + rev = REV_B1;

This is based on ATF code in vendor tree, but shouldn't we have some
sort of explanation for this "magic"?

Looking at the OCOTP driver reg 0x40 is IMX_OCOTP_ADDR_DATA2 and it's
used as part of fuse writes. According to the driver code 8mq is
compatible with 7d and this write path is enabled for imx8mq-ocotp.

Looking at the OCOTP manual reg 0x40 is OCOTP_HW_OCOTP_READ_FUSE_DATA
and it's meant to be used together with IMX_OCOTP_ADDR_CTRL to read
info. Maybe my manual (rev0 2018-01) is incorrect?

Looking at the manual this will return the value of the fuse last
requested via IMX_OCOTP_ADDR_CTRL but no such request is made in this
driver. So reading from OCOTP 0x40 might return an unrelated value?!

The manual does document that fuse 0x440[3:0] is a "silicon revision
number"; maybe we should read that?

 \ /
  Last update: 2019-03-28 17:45    [W:0.072 / U:14.600 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site