lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Mar]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.0 192/262] nfp: bpf: correct the behavior for shifts by zero
Date
From: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com>

[ Upstream commit db0a4b3b6b83a081a9ec309cc8178e5c9b4706a5 ]

Shifts by zero do nothing, and should be treated as nops.

Even though compiler is not supposed to generate such instructions and
manual written assembly is unlikely to have them, but they are legal
instructions and have defined behavior.

This patch correct existing shifts code-gen to make sure they do nothing
when shift amount is zero except when the instruction is ALU32 for which
high bits need to be cleared.

For shift amount bigger than type size, already, NFP JIT back-end errors
out for immediate shift and only low 5 bits will be taken into account for
indirect shift which is the same as x86.

Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/jit.c | 30 +++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/jit.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/jit.c
index 0a868c829b90..b71ecde7e1d2 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/jit.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/jit.c
@@ -1958,6 +1958,9 @@ static int neg_reg64(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct nfp_insn_meta *meta)
*/
static int __shl_imm64(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, u8 dst, u8 shift_amt)
{
+ if (!shift_amt)
+ return 0;
+
if (shift_amt < 32) {
emit_shf(nfp_prog, reg_both(dst + 1), reg_a(dst + 1),
SHF_OP_NONE, reg_b(dst), SHF_SC_R_DSHF,
@@ -2070,6 +2073,9 @@ static int shl_reg64(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct nfp_insn_meta *meta)
*/
static int __shr_imm64(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, u8 dst, u8 shift_amt)
{
+ if (!shift_amt)
+ return 0;
+
if (shift_amt < 32) {
emit_shf(nfp_prog, reg_both(dst), reg_a(dst + 1), SHF_OP_NONE,
reg_b(dst), SHF_SC_R_DSHF, shift_amt);
@@ -2171,6 +2177,9 @@ static int shr_reg64(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct nfp_insn_meta *meta)
*/
static int __ashr_imm64(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, u8 dst, u8 shift_amt)
{
+ if (!shift_amt)
+ return 0;
+
if (shift_amt < 32) {
emit_shf(nfp_prog, reg_both(dst), reg_a(dst + 1), SHF_OP_NONE,
reg_b(dst), SHF_SC_R_DSHF, shift_amt);
@@ -2379,10 +2388,13 @@ static int neg_reg(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct nfp_insn_meta *meta)

static int __ashr_imm(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, u8 dst, u8 shift_amt)
{
- /* Set signedness bit (MSB of result). */
- emit_alu(nfp_prog, reg_none(), reg_a(dst), ALU_OP_OR, reg_imm(0));
- emit_shf(nfp_prog, reg_both(dst), reg_none(), SHF_OP_ASHR, reg_b(dst),
- SHF_SC_R_SHF, shift_amt);
+ if (shift_amt) {
+ /* Set signedness bit (MSB of result). */
+ emit_alu(nfp_prog, reg_none(), reg_a(dst), ALU_OP_OR,
+ reg_imm(0));
+ emit_shf(nfp_prog, reg_both(dst), reg_none(), SHF_OP_ASHR,
+ reg_b(dst), SHF_SC_R_SHF, shift_amt);
+ }
wrp_immed(nfp_prog, reg_both(dst + 1), 0);

return 0;
@@ -2424,12 +2436,10 @@ static int shl_imm(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct nfp_insn_meta *meta)
{
const struct bpf_insn *insn = &meta->insn;

- if (!insn->imm)
- return 1; /* TODO: zero shift means indirect */
-
- emit_shf(nfp_prog, reg_both(insn->dst_reg * 2),
- reg_none(), SHF_OP_NONE, reg_b(insn->dst_reg * 2),
- SHF_SC_L_SHF, insn->imm);
+ if (insn->imm)
+ emit_shf(nfp_prog, reg_both(insn->dst_reg * 2),
+ reg_none(), SHF_OP_NONE, reg_b(insn->dst_reg * 2),
+ SHF_SC_L_SHF, insn->imm);
wrp_immed(nfp_prog, reg_both(insn->dst_reg * 2 + 1), 0);

return 0;
--
2.19.1
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-03-27 19:08    [W:0.578 / U:2.816 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site