[lkml]   [2019]   [Mar]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC v4 00/17] kunit: introduce KUnit, the Linux kernel unit testing framework
On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 6:23 PM Frank Rowand <> wrote:
> On 3/4/19 3:01 PM, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 1:38 PM Brendan Higgins
< snip >
> > Someone suggested I should send the next revision out as "PATCH"
> > instead of "RFC" since there seems to be general consensus about
> > everything at a high level, with a couple exceptions.
> >
> > At this time I am planning on sending the next revision out as "[PATCH
> > v1 00/NN] kunit: introduce KUnit, the Linux kernel unit testing
> > framework". Initially I wasn't sure if the next revision should be
> > "[PATCH v1 ...]" or "[PATCH v5 ...]". Please let me know if you have a
> > strong objection to the former.
> >
> > In the next revision, I will be dropping the last two of three patches
> > for the DT unit tests as there doesn't seem to be enough features
> > currently available to justify the heavy refactoring I did; however, I
> Thank you.
> > will still include the patch that just converts everything over to
> > KUnit without restructuring the test cases:
> >
> The link doesn't work for me (don't worry about that), so I'm assuming
> this is:
> [RFC v4 15/17] of: unittest: migrate tests to run on KUnit

That's correct.

> The conversation on that patch ended after:
> >> After adding patch 15, there are a lot of "unittest internal error" messages.
> >
> > Yeah, I meant to ask you about that. I thought it was due to a change
> > you made, but after further examination, just now, I found it was my
> > fault. Sorry for not mentioning that anywhere. I will fix it in v5.
> It is not worth my time to look at patch 15 when it is that broken. So I
> have not done any review of it.

Right, I didn't expect you to, we were still discussing things on RFC
v3 at the time. I think I got you comments on v3 in a very short time
frame around sending out v4; hence why your comments were not

> So no, I think you are still in the RFC stage unless you drop patch 15.

Noted. I might split that out into a separate RFC then.

> >
> > I should have the next revision out in a week or so.
> >


 \ /
  Last update: 2019-03-25 23:12    [W:0.082 / U:1.648 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site