lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Mar]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 04:12:39PM +0000, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> mdev-nvme seems like a duplication of SPDK. The performance is not
> better and the features are more limited, so why focus on this approach?
>
> One argument might be that the kernel NVMe subsystem wants to offer this
> functionality and loading the kernel module is more convenient than
> managing SPDK to some users.
>
> Thoughts?

Doesn't SPDK bind a controller to a single process? mdev binds to
namespaces (or their partitions), so you could have many mdev's assigned
to many VMs accessing a single controller.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-03-21 17:21    [W:0.065 / U:6.768 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site