lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Mar]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 03/12] percpu: introduce helper to determine if two regions overlap
On Sat, Mar 02, 2019 at 01:37:37PM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> Hi Dennis,
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org [mailto:owner-linux-mm@kvack.org] On
> > Behalf Of Dennis Zhou
> > Sent: 2019年2月28日 10:19
> > To: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>; Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>; Christoph
> > Lameter <cl@linux.com>
> > Cc: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@mellanox.com>; kernel-team@fb.com;
> > linux-mm@kvack.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> > Subject: [PATCH 03/12] percpu: introduce helper to determine if two regions
> > overlap
> >
> > While block hints were always accurate, it's possible when spanning across
> > blocks that we miss updating the chunk's contig_hint. Rather than rely on
> > correctness of the boundaries of hints, do a full overlap comparison.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > mm/percpu.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> > 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/percpu.c b/mm/percpu.c
> > index 69ca51d238b5..b40112b2fc59 100644
> > --- a/mm/percpu.c
> > +++ b/mm/percpu.c
> > @@ -546,6 +546,24 @@ static inline int pcpu_cnt_pop_pages(struct
> > pcpu_chunk *chunk, int bit_off,
> > bitmap_weight(chunk->populated, page_start); }
> >
> > +/*
> > + * pcpu_region_overlap - determines if two regions overlap
> > + * @a: start of first region, inclusive
> > + * @b: end of first region, exclusive
> > + * @x: start of second region, inclusive
> > + * @y: end of second region, exclusive
> > + *
> > + * This is used to determine if the hint region [a, b) overlaps with
> > +the
> > + * allocated region [x, y).
> > + */
> > +static inline bool pcpu_region_overlap(int a, int b, int x, int y) {
> > + if ((x >= a && x < b) || (y > a && y <= b) ||
> > + (x <= a && y >= b))
>
> I think this could be simplified:
> (a < y) && (x < b) could be used to do overlap check.
>

I'll change it to be the negative.

Thanks,
Dennis

>
> > + return true;
> > + return false;
> > +}
> > +
> > /**
> > * pcpu_chunk_update - updates the chunk metadata given a free area
> > * @chunk: chunk of interest
> > @@ -710,8 +728,11 @@ static void pcpu_block_update_hint_alloc(struct
> > pcpu_chunk *chunk, int bit_off,
> > PCPU_BITMAP_BLOCK_BITS,
> > s_off + bits);
> >
> > - if (s_off >= s_block->contig_hint_start &&
> > - s_off < s_block->contig_hint_start + s_block->contig_hint) {
> > + if (pcpu_region_overlap(s_block->contig_hint_start,
> > + s_block->contig_hint_start +
> > + s_block->contig_hint,
> > + s_off,
> > + s_off + bits)) {
> > /* block contig hint is broken - scan to fix it */
> > pcpu_block_refresh_hint(chunk, s_index);
> > } else {
> > @@ -764,8 +785,10 @@ static void pcpu_block_update_hint_alloc(struct
> > pcpu_chunk *chunk, int bit_off,
> > * contig hint is broken. Otherwise, it means a smaller space
> > * was used and therefore the chunk contig hint is still correct.
> > */
> > - if (bit_off >= chunk->contig_bits_start &&
> > - bit_off < chunk->contig_bits_start + chunk->contig_bits)
> > + if (pcpu_region_overlap(chunk->contig_bits_start,
> > + chunk->contig_bits_start + chunk->contig_bits,
> > + bit_off,
> > + bit_off + bits))
> > pcpu_chunk_refresh_hint(chunk);
> > }
> >
> > --
> > 2.17.1
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-03-02 23:26    [W:0.071 / U:13.788 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site