lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Mar]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCHv2] x86/boot/KASLR: skip the specified crashkernel reserved region
Please change subject as:

"x86/boot/KASLR: skip the specified crashkernel region"

Don't see why reserved is needed here.

On 03/13/19 at 12:19pm, Pingfan Liu wrote:
> crashkernel=x@y option may fail to reserve the required memory region if
> KASLR puts kernel into the region. To avoid this uncertainty, making KASLR
> skip the required region.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
> Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>
> Cc: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com>
> Cc: Chao Fan <fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
> Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> ---
> v1 -> v2: fix some trival format
>
> arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c
> index 9ed9709..e185318 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c
> @@ -109,6 +109,7 @@ enum mem_avoid_index {
> MEM_AVOID_BOOTPARAMS,
> MEM_AVOID_MEMMAP_BEGIN,
> MEM_AVOID_MEMMAP_END = MEM_AVOID_MEMMAP_BEGIN + MAX_MEMMAP_REGIONS - 1,
> + MEM_AVOID_CRASHKERNEL,
> MEM_AVOID_MAX,
> };
>
> @@ -240,6 +241,25 @@ static void parse_gb_huge_pages(char *param, char *val)
> }
> }
>
> +/* parse crashkernel=x@y option */
> +static void mem_avoid_crashkernel_simple(char *option)

Chao ever mentioned this, I want to ask again, why does it has to be
xxx_simple()?

Except of these, patch looks good to me. It's a nice catch, and only
need a simple fix based on the current code.

Thanks
Baoquan

> +{
> + unsigned long long crash_size, crash_base;
> + char *cur = option;
> +
> + crash_size = memparse(option, &cur);
> + if (option == cur)
> + return;
> +
> + if (*cur == '@') {
> + option = cur + 1;
> + crash_base = memparse(option, &cur);
> + if (option == cur)
> + return;
> + mem_avoid[MEM_AVOID_CRASHKERNEL].start = crash_base;
> + mem_avoid[MEM_AVOID_CRASHKERNEL].size = crash_size;
> + }
> +}
>
> static void handle_mem_options(void)
> {
> @@ -250,7 +270,7 @@ static void handle_mem_options(void)
> u64 mem_size;
>
> if (!strstr(args, "memmap=") && !strstr(args, "mem=") &&
> - !strstr(args, "hugepages"))
> + !strstr(args, "hugepages") && !strstr(args, "crashkernel="))
> return;
>
> tmp_cmdline = malloc(len + 1);
> @@ -286,6 +306,8 @@ static void handle_mem_options(void)
> goto out;
>
> mem_limit = mem_size;
> + } else if (strstr(param, "crashkernel")) {
> + mem_avoid_crashkernel_simple(val);
> }
> }
>
> @@ -414,7 +436,7 @@ static void mem_avoid_init(unsigned long input, unsigned long input_size,
>
> /* We don't need to set a mapping for setup_data. */
>
> - /* Mark the memmap regions we need to avoid */
> + /* Mark the regions we need to avoid */
> handle_mem_options();
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_VERBOSE_BOOTUP
> --
> 2.7.4
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-03-20 01:26    [W:0.094 / U:3.512 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site