lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Mar]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] spi: mediatek: Attempt to address style issues in spi-mt7621.c
From
Date


On 14/03/2019 14:24, Stefan Roese wrote:
> On 14.03.19 14:14, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 14/03/2019 12:37, Armando Miraglia wrote:
>>> Absolutely!
>>
>> Please don't top post :)
>>
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> A.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 12:36 PM Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de> wrote:
>> [...]
>>>>
>>>> Would it be possible for you to wait a bit with this minor cleanup?
>>>> As I'm preparing a patch to move this driver out of staging right
>>>> now. You can definitely follow-up with your cleanup, once this move
>>>> is done. Otherwise the move might be delayed even more.
>>>>
>>
>> Hm but shouldn't style issues be a criteria for not accepting a move out of
>> staging?
>
> I would agree, if those style issues where non trivial. In the end we
> are talking about one non-optimal identation now.>

Fair enough, anyway I'm not the person to decide on that :)

Regards,
Matthias

>> I think so. You could add Armandos patch in your series or rebase your
>> series against Greg's tree, once he took the clean-up. Normally Greg is
>> incredibly fast :)
>
> I should have included the history here to make this more clean. I've
> started pulling this driver out of staging a few weeks ago:
>
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10790537/
> ...
>
> Here you find Greg's comment, that the style patches should be merged
> first before the move out of staging. This is what I worked on after
> this first patch series:
>
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10792455/
> ...
>
> Now these 9 style issue patches from me have been merged and I would
> like to proceed with the driver move.
>
> Thanks,
> Stefan

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-03-14 18:02    [W:0.075 / U:9.068 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site