[lkml]   [2019]   [Mar]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/3] userfaultfd: allow to forbid unprivileged users
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 4:00 AM Paolo Bonzini <> wrote:
> On 14/03/19 00:44, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > Then I thought we can add a tristate so an open of /dev/kvm would also
> > allow the syscall to make things more user friendly because
> > unprivileged containers ideally should have writable mounts done with
> > nodev and no matter the privilege they shouldn't ever get an hold on
> > the KVM driver (and those who do, like kubevirt, will then just work).
> I wouldn't even bother with the KVM special case. Containers can use
> seccomp if they want a fine-grained policy.
> (Actually I wouldn't bother with the knob at all; the attack surface of
> userfaultfd is infinitesimal compared to the BPF JIT...).

please name _one_ BPF JIT bug that affected unprivileged user space.

 \ /
  Last update: 2019-03-14 16:25    [W:0.138 / U:4.100 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site