[lkml]   [2019]   [Mar]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] spi: mediatek: Attempt to address style issues in spi-mt7621.c
On 14.03.19 14:14, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> On 14/03/2019 12:37, Armando Miraglia wrote:
>> Absolutely!
> Please don't top post :)
>> Cheers,
>> A.
>> On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 12:36 PM Stefan Roese <> wrote:
> [...]
>>> Would it be possible for you to wait a bit with this minor cleanup?
>>> As I'm preparing a patch to move this driver out of staging right
>>> now. You can definitely follow-up with your cleanup, once this move
>>> is done. Otherwise the move might be delayed even more.
> Hm but shouldn't style issues be a criteria for not accepting a move out of
> staging?

I would agree, if those style issues where non trivial. In the end we
are talking about one non-optimal identation now.

> I think so. You could add Armandos patch in your series or rebase your
> series against Greg's tree, once he took the clean-up. Normally Greg is
> incredibly fast :)

I should have included the history here to make this more clean. I've
started pulling this driver out of staging a few weeks ago:

Here you find Greg's comment, that the style patches should be merged
first before the move out of staging. This is what I worked on after
this first patch series:

Now these 9 style issue patches from me have been merged and I would
like to proceed with the driver move.


 \ /
  Last update: 2019-03-14 14:24    [W:0.080 / U:0.748 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site