lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Feb]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH] clk: sunxi-ng: sun4i: Use CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT for mmc2 clock
On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 10:20:00AM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 09:44:02PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 5:45 PM Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, Feb 02, 2019 at 05:52:09PM +0200, Priit Laes wrote:
> > > > Recent patch of improving MP clock rate calculations by taking
> > > > into account whether adjusting parent rate is allowed, have
> > > > unfortunately broken eMMC support on A20 Olinuxino-Lime2-eMMC
> > > > boards which fail with following error:
> > > >
> > > > [snip]
> > > > EXT4-fs (mmcblk1p4): INFO: recovery required on readonly filesystem
> > > > EXT4-fs (mmcblk1p4): write access will be enabled during recovery
> > > > sunxi-mmc 1c11000.mmc: data error, sending stop command
> > > > sunxi-mmc 1c11000.mmc: send stop command failed
> > > > [/snip]
> > > >
> > > > Previously, mmc2 clock was requesting 520MHz and settling at 512MHz
> > > > clock rate with following parents:
> >
> > You mean 52 and 51.2 MHz.
> >
> > > > [snip]
> > > > pll-ddr-base 2 2 0 768000000 0 0 50000
> > > > pll-ddr-other 1 1 0 768000000 0 0 50000
> > > > mmc2 0 0 0 51200000 0 0 50000
> > > > [/snip]
> > > >
> > > > Now, after the improvements, requested and settled rate are both
> > > > 520MHz, but as mmc2 clock cannot adjust parent rate, the situation
> > > > ends up like this:
> > > > [snip]
> > > > pll-periph-base 3 3 0 1200000000 0 0 50000
> > > > pll-periph 6 6 0 600000000 0 0 50000
> > > > mmc2 3 3 0 50000000 0 0 50000
> > > > [/snip]
> > > >
> > > > With this patch (allowing mmc2 to set parent rate), we end up with
> > > > working tree with both mmc0 (sd-card) and mmc2 (eMMC) working:
> > > > [snip]
> > > > pll-periph-base 3 3 0 312000000 0 0 50000
> > > > mbus 1 1 0 78000000 0 0 50000
> > > > pll-periph-sata 1 1 0 26000000 0 0 50000
> > > > sata 1 1 0 26000000 0 0 50000
> > > > pll-periph 5 5 0 156000000 0 0 50000
> > > > mmc2 0 0 0 52000000 0 0 50000
> > > > mmc0 0 0 0 39000000 0 0 50000
> > > > [/snip]
> > > >
> > > > Fixes: 3f790433c3cb ("clk: sunxi-ng: Adjust MP clock parent rate when allowed")
> > > > Signed-off-by: Priit Laes <plaes@plaes.org>
> > >
> > > Applied, thanks!
> > > Maxime
> >
> > I'm concerned for other users of the PLL-PERIPH clock. AFAIK
> > all of them, except the HRTIMER, expect the clock rate to stay
> > the same and not change underneath them. And SATA expects it to
> > be at 600 MHz, as the datasheet says. And while it may not directly
> > apply to the LIME2, eMMC on newer SoCs / boards run at the slightly
> > reduced rate of 50 MHz just fine.
> >
> > In the commit in question, clocks without CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT
> > should be using the old code (now in the if conditional block),
> > i.e. the behavior should not have changed.
> >
> > I don't think this actually "fixes" whatever bug was introduced,
> > but only papers over the issue, and possible introduces further
> > issues for other users.
>
> You're right, I've overlooked that it was pll-periph being
> affected. I've dropped it for now.

Any ideas what could be done. I currently have no time to debug it, but it affects existing systems.
>
> Maxime
>
> --
> Maxime Ripard, Bootlin
> Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
> https://bootlin.com


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-02-06 11:04    [W:0.067 / U:0.628 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site