lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Feb]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 1/3] perf diff: Support --time filter option
From
Date


On 2/27/2019 5:27 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 08:11:07PM +0800, Jin Yao wrote:
>
> SNIP
>
>> + abstime_tmp = abstime_ostr;
>>
>> data__for_each_file(i, d) {
>> - d->session = perf_session__new(&d->data, false, &tool);
>> + d->session = perf_session__new(&d->data, false, &pdiff.tool);
>> if (!d->session) {
>> pr_err("Failed to open %s\n", d->data.path);
>> ret = -1;
>> goto out_delete;
>> }
>>
>> + if (abstime_ostr) {
>> + ret = parse_absolute_time(d, &abstime_tmp);
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + goto out_delete;
>> + } else if (pdiff.time_str) {
>> + ret = parse_percent_time(d);
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + goto out_delete;
>> + } else {
>> + pdiff.range_num = 1;
>
> hum, why are we setting range_num to 1 again?

Yes, that may be not necessary. I will remove this line and test again.

>
> it's really hard to parse this code, maybe
> it'd be better in separate loop/function
> that would setup just timestamps..
>

Do you mean the above parsing code should be put in a separate function
(e.g. parse_time_string in following example)?

data__for_each_file(i, d) {
....
d->session = perf_session__new(&d->data, false, &pdiff.tool);
....
parse_time_string(...);
ret = perf_session__process_events(d->session);
....
}

Thanks
Jin Yao

>
> thanks,
> jirka
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-02-27 14:05    [W:0.045 / U:2.104 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site