lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Feb]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 23/32] softirq: Remove stale comment
On 2019-02-12 18:14:14 [+0100], Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> __local_bh_disable_ip() is neither for strict internal use nor does it
> require the caller to disable hardirqs. Probaby a celebration for ancient

Probaby

> behaviour.

I think the point was to override the IP for the tracer. So everyone
else used local_bh_disable() and was recorded as the caller except for
softirq.c internal usage where __do_softirq() did also
"local_bh_disable()" but recorded its caller (instead recording
__do_softirq()).

Sebastian

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-02-27 12:05    [W:0.206 / U:11.612 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site