[lkml]   [2019]   [Feb]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] x86: uaccess: fix regression in unsafe_get_user

> On Feb 16, 2019, at 3:47 PM, Al Viro <> wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 16, 2019 at 02:50:15PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> What is the actual problem? We’re not actually demand-faulting this data, are we? Are we just overrunning the buffer because the from_user helpers are too clever? Can we fix it for real by having the fancy helpers do *aligned* loads so that they don’t overrun the buffer? Heck, this might be faster, too.
> Unaligned _stores_ are not any cheaper, and you'd get one hell of
> extra arithmetics from trying to avoid both. Check something
> like e.g. memcpy() on alpha, where you really have to keep all
> accesses aligned, both on load and on store side.

I think we should avoid unaligned loads and do unaligned stores instead.

I would general expect that unaligned stores are a bit cheaper since they don’t need to complete for the comparisons to happen.

But I maintain my claim that this code should not be overrunning its input buffer into the next page, since it could have observable side effects.

> Can't we just pad the buffers a bit? Making sure that name_buf
> and symlink_buf are _not_ followed by unmapped pages shouldn't
> be hard. Both are allocated by kmalloc(), so...
> What am I missing here?

 \ /
  Last update: 2019-02-17 03:38    [W:0.114 / U:5.200 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site