lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Feb]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3] x86/ima: require signed kernel modules
From
Date
On Fri, 2019-02-15 at 09:01 -0800, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 11:50:18AM -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> > Have the IMA architecture specific policy require signed kernel modules
> > on systems with secure boot mode enabled; and coordinate the different
> > signature verification methods, so only one signature is required.
> >
> > Requiring appended kernel module signatures may be configured, enabled
> > on the boot command line, or with this patch enabled in secure boot
> > mode. This patch defines set_module_sig_enforced().
> >
> > To coordinate between appended kernel module signatures and IMA
> > signatures, only define an IMA MODULE_CHECK policy rule if
> > CONFIG_MODULE_SIG is not enabled. A custom IMA policy may still define
> > and require an IMA signature.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>

Thanks!

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-02-15 18:59    [W:0.057 / U:33.444 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site