lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Feb]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 10/10] x86/split_lock: Handle #AC exception for split lock

* Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 11:53:39AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > + do_trap(trapnr, signr, str, regs, error_code, BUS_ADRALN, NULL);
> > > + }
> > > +}
> >
> > Is there any experience with how frequently this signal is killing
> > user-space processes on a modern distro? Any expectation of how frequent
> > such SIGBUS task terminations are going to be in the field?
>
> We did pretty intensive testing internally (zero day tests, many engineers
> and testers use the patches in their dailly work, etc). So far I'm not
> aware of any user space process hiting split lock issue. I guess GCC or
> other compilers takes care of the issue already. Inline assembly code may
> hit the issue if code is not right, but there are fewer inline assembly
> code in user space.
>
> So far we only find two kernel split lock issues and fix them in the first
> two patches in this patch set. We also find one BIOS split lock issue
> internally which has been fixed in production BIOS.
>
> Thanks.

Ok, still, for binary compatibility's sake, could you please add a sysctl
knob (root-only, etc.) and a kernel boot parameter that disables this
check?

Looks good otherwise.

Thanks,

Ingo

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-02-13 09:15    [W:0.086 / U:11.092 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site