[lkml]   [2019]   [Feb]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [Qemu-devel] security implications of caching with virtio pmem (was Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] kvm "virtio pmem" device)
On 11.02.19 23:29, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 02:29:46AM -0500, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
>> Hello Dave,
>> Are we okay with this?
> Sure.
> I'm not sure I agree with all the analysis presented, but, well, I
> haven't looked any deeper because I'm tired of being shouted at and
> being called argumentative for daring to ask hard questions about
> this topic....

I think if you have concerns, they should definitely be discussed.
Making people frustrated that review code is not what we want. Not at all.

I suggest that Pankaj properly documents what we found out so far about
security concerns and properly describes intended use cases and answers
other questions you had in the cover letter / documentation of the
follow up series.

Thanks Dave!

> Cheers,
> Dave.



David / dhildenb

 \ /
  Last update: 2019-02-11 23:59    [W:0.086 / U:6.104 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site