lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Dec]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] netfilter: nf_flow_table_offload: Correct memcpy size for flow_overload_mangle
On Sat, Dec 7, 2019 at 11:38 AM Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 04:58:30PM -0600, Justin Forbes wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 2:50 PM Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 12/3/19 12:01 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 11:03:45AM -0500, Laura Abbott wrote:
> > > >> The sizes for memcpy in flow_offload_mangle don't match
> > > >> the source variables, leading to overflow errors on some
> > > >> build configurations:
> > > >>
> > > >> In function 'memcpy',
> > > >> inlined from 'flow_offload_mangle' at net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_offload.c:112:2,
> > > >> inlined from 'flow_offload_port_dnat' at net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_offload.c:373:2,
> > > >> inlined from 'nf_flow_rule_route_ipv4' at net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_offload.c:424:3:
> > > >> ./include/linux/string.h:376:4: error: call to '__read_overflow2' declared with attribute error: detected read beyond size of object passed as 2nd parameter
> > > >> 376 | __read_overflow2();
> > > >> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > >> make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:266: net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_offload.o] Error 1
> > > >>
> > > >> Fix this by using the corresponding type.
> > > >>
> > > >> Fixes: c29f74e0df7a ("netfilter: nf_flow_table: hardware offload support")
> > > >> Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>
> > > >> ---
> > > >> Seen on a Fedora powerpc little endian build with -O3 but it looks like
> > > >> it is correctly catching an error with doing a memcpy outside the source
> > > >> variable.
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > It is right but the fix is not. In that call trace:
> > > >
> > > > flow_offload_port_dnat() {
> > > > ...
> > > > u32 mask = ~htonl(0xffff);
> > > > __be16 port;
> > > > ...
> > > > flow_offload_mangle(entry, flow_offload_l4proto(flow), offset,
> > > > (u8 *)&port, (u8 *)&mask);
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > port should have a 32b storage as well, and aligned with the mask.
> > > >
> > > >> ---
> > > >> net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_offload.c | 4 ++--
> > > >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > >>
> > > >> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_offload.c b/net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_offload.c
> > > >> index c54c9a6cc981..526f894d0bdb 100644
> > > >> --- a/net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_offload.c
> > > >> +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_offload.c
> > > >> @@ -108,8 +108,8 @@ static void flow_offload_mangle(struct flow_action_entry *entry,
> > > >> entry->id = FLOW_ACTION_MANGLE;
> > > >> entry->mangle.htype = htype;
> > > >> entry->mangle.offset = offset;
> > > >> - memcpy(&entry->mangle.mask, mask, sizeof(u32));
> > > >> - memcpy(&entry->mangle.val, value, sizeof(u32));
> > > > ^^^^^ ^^^ which is &port in the call above
> > > >> + memcpy(&entry->mangle.mask, mask, sizeof(u8));
> > > >> + memcpy(&entry->mangle.val, value, sizeof(u8));
> > > >
> > > > This fix would cause it to copy only the first byte, which is not the
> > > > intention.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Thanks for the review. I took another look at fixing this and I
> > > think it might be better for the maintainer or someone who is more
> > > familiar with the code to fix this. I ended up down a rabbit
> > > hole trying to get the types to work and I wasn't confident about
> > > the casting.
> >
> > Any update on this? It is definitely a problem on PPC LE.
>
> I'm attaching a tentative patch to address this problem.
>
This patch does in fact fix the build issue.

Thanks,
Justin

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-12-09 18:57    [W:0.040 / U:0.500 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site