lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Dec]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [RFCv1 0/8] RK3399 clean shutdown issue
From
Date
On 09/12/2019 1:37 pm, Peter Geis wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 8:29 AM Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 06/12/2019 6:45 pm, Anand Moon wrote:
>>> Most of the RK3399 SBC boards do not perform clean
>>> shutdown and clean reboot.
>>
>> FWIW reboot problems on RK3399 have been tracked down to issues in
>> upstream ATF, and are unrelated to the PMIC.
>>
>>> These patches try to help resolve the issue with proper
>>> shutdown by turning off the PMIC.
>>
>> As mentioned elsewhere[1], although this is what the BSP kernel seems to
>> do, and in practice it's unlikely to matter for the majority of devboard
>> users like you and me, I still feel a bit uncomfortable with this
>> solution for systems using ATF as in principle the secure world might
>> want to know about orderly shutdowns, and this effectively makes every
>> shutdown an unexpected power loss from secure software's point of view.
>>
>> Robin.
>
> Since ATF is operating completely in volatile memory, and shouldn't be
> touching hardware once it passes off control to the kernel anyways,
> what is the harm of pulling the rug out from under it?
> If this idea is to prevent issues in the future, such as if ATF does
> gain the ability to preempt hardware control, then at that time ATF
> will need to be able to handle actually powering off devices using the
> same functionality.

It's not ATF itself I'm concerned about, but arbitrary Secure EL1
payloads. In theory, a TEE might want to do something like cycle keys or
log events in a TPM (or just encrypted in an external SPI flash), or
scrub secure DRAM for cold boot protection. I'm pretty sure none of us
are running such a thing on our boards today, but an upstream solution
really wants to be robust for the general case.

> But as we discussed previously, ATF doesn't have this capability, so
> in this case any board without a dedicated power-off gpio will be
> unable to power off at all.
> Also it seems that giving ATF this functionality, with the current
> state of ATF, would be cost prohibitive.
>
> I personally feel that allowing the kernel to do this is a solution to
> the problem we have now.

Sure - I do like your cool idea of using a custom reboot reason to
handle a 'trusted' poweroff in the U-Boot SPL - but in the meantime
anything would be a practical improvement over the current situation. I
reckon this other patch[1] (this seems to be a popular issue all of a
sudden!) looks like the neatest interim step.

Robin.

[1]
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-rockchip/2019-December/028245.html

>>> For reference
>>> RK805 PMCI data sheet:
>>> [0] http://rockchip.fr/RK805%20datasheet%20V1.3.pdf
>>> RK808 PMIC data sheet:
>>> [1] http://rockchip.fr/RK808%20datasheet%20V1.4.pdf
>>> RK817 PMIC data sheet:
>>> [2] http://rockchip.fr/RK817%20datasheet%20V1.01.pdf
>>> RK818 PMIC data sheet:
>>> [3] http://rockchip.fr/RK818%20datasheet%20V1.0.pdf
>>>
>>> Reboot issue:
>>> My guess is that we need to some proper sequence of
>>> setting to PMCI to perform clean.
>>>
>>> If you have any input please share them.
>>>
>>> Tested on SBC
>>> Rock960 Model A
>>> Odroid N1
>>> Rock64
>>>
>>> -Anand Moon
>>>
>>> Anand Moon (8):
>>> mfd: rk808: Refactor shutdown functions
>>> mfd: rk808: use syscore for RK805 PMIC shutdown
>>> mfd: rk808: use syscore for RK808 PMIC shutdown
>>> mfd: rk808: use syscore for RK818 PMIC shutdown
>>> mfd: rk808: cleanup unused function pointer
>>> mfd: rk808: use common syscore for all PMCI for clean shutdown
>>> arm64: rockchip: drop unused field from rk8xx i2c node
>>> arm: rockchip: drop unused field from rk8xx i2c node
>>>
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3036-kylin.dts | 1 -
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3188-px3-evb.dts | 1 -
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-evb-rk808.dts | 1 -
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-phycore-som.dtsi | 1 -
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-popmetal.dts | 1 -
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-tinker.dtsi | 1 -
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-veyron.dtsi | 1 -
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-vyasa.dts | 1 -
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/rv1108-elgin-r1.dts | 1 -
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/rv1108-evb.dts | 1 -
>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30-evb.dts | 1 -
>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3328-a1.dts | 1 -
>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3328-evb.dts | 1 -
>>> .../arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3328-roc-cc.dts | 1 -
>>> .../arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3328-rock64.dts | 1 -
>>> .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3368-geekbox.dts | 1 -
>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3368-lion.dtsi | 1 -
>>> .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3368-px5-evb.dts | 1 -
>>> .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-firefly.dts | 1 -
>>> .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-hugsun-x99.dts | 1 -
>>> .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-khadas-edge.dtsi | 1 -
>>> .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-leez-p710.dts | 1 -
>>> .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-nanopi4.dtsi | 1 -
>>> .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-orangepi.dts | 1 -
>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-puma.dtsi | 1 -
>>> .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc.dtsi | 1 -
>>> .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock-pi-4.dts | 1 -
>>> .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock960.dtsi | 1 -
>>> .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64.dts | 1 -
>>> .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-sapphire.dtsi | 1 -
>>> drivers/mfd/rk808.c | 144 +++++-------------
>>> include/linux/mfd/rk808.h | 2 -
>>> 32 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 134 deletions(-)
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Linux-rockchip mailing list
>> Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-12-09 14:58    [W:0.167 / U:45.232 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site