lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Dec]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: acpi/hmat: don't mix pxm and nid when setting memory target processor_pxm
Date
On Friday, November 29, 2019 1:54:44 PM CET Brice Goglin wrote:
> Le 28/10/2019 à 10:11, Brice Goglin a écrit :
> > On systems where PXMs and nids are in different order, memory initiators
> > exposed in sysfs could be wrong: On dual-socket CLX with SNC enabled
> > (4 nodes, 1 and 2 swapped between PXMs and nids), node1 would only
> > get node2 as initiator, and node2 would only get node1.
> >
> > With this patch, we get node1 as the only initiator of itself,
> > and node2 as the only initiator of itself, as expected.
> >
> > This should likely go to stable up to 5.2.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@inria.fr>
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/hmat/hmat.c b/drivers/acpi/hmat/hmat.c
> > index 8f9a28a870b0..3ca3c7c97ee0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/hmat/hmat.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/hmat/hmat.c
> > @@ -417,7 +417,7 @@ static int __init hmat_parse_proximity_domain(union acpi_subtable_headers *heade
> > pr_debug("HMAT: Invalid Processor Domain\n");
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> > - target->processor_pxm = p_node;
> > + target->processor_pxm = p->processor_PD;
> > }
> >
> > return 0;
> >
>
> Can we have somebody please review this patch? I didn't get any reply
> from Keith since I first sent it to him in early September unfortunately.
>
> Without this patch, memory initiators are exposed wrong on our Dell R740.

See commit 4caa525b783b ("ACPI: HMAT: don't mix pxm and nid when setting memory
target processor_pxm") in 5.5-rc1.

Thanks!




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-12-09 13:29    [W:0.029 / U:2.576 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site