lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Dec]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [RFC 0/3] Introduce per-task latency_tolerance for scheduler hints
From
Date


On 12/6/19 6:01 PM, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> On 05.12.19 18:13, Parth Shah wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 12/5/19 7:33 PM, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
>>> On 05/12/2019 11:49, Valentin Schneider wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 05/12/2019 09:24, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
>>>>> On 25/11/2019 10:46, Parth Shah wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>> OK, I went through this thread again. So Google or we have to provide
>>> the missing per-taskgroup API via cpu controller's attributes (like for
>>> uclamp) for the EAS usecase.
>>
>> I suppose many others (including myself) will also be interested in having
>> per-taskgroup attribute via CPU controller.
>
> Ok, let us have a look since Android needs it.
>
> [...]
>
>> I kept choosing appropriate name and possible values for this new attribute
>> in the separate thread. https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/9/30/215
>> From which discussion, looking at Patrick's comment
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/9/18/678 I thought of picking latency_tolerance
>> as the appropriate name.
>> Still will be happy to change as per the community needs.
>
> Yeah, SCHED_FLAG_LATENCY_TOLERANCE seems to be pretty long.
>

Hi, I'm thinking of sending v2 for the patch series and for the sake of
continuity, I will maintain the name as it is because I'm expecting further
response from other developers for the latency_nice. Will re-spin the
series with new name if people agrees upon.


Best,
Parth

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-12-08 06:58    [W:0.074 / U:1.784 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site