lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Dec]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 03/15] soc: tegra: Add Tegra PMC clock registrations into PMC driver
From
Date

On 12/7/19 11:59 AM, Sowjanya Komatineni wrote:
>
> On 12/7/19 8:00 AM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> 07.12.2019 18:53, Dmitry Osipenko пишет:
>>> 07.12.2019 18:47, Dmitry Osipenko пишет:
>>>> 07.12.2019 17:28, Dmitry Osipenko пишет:
>>>>> 06.12.2019 05:48, Sowjanya Komatineni пишет:
>>>>>> Tegra210 and prior Tegra PMC has clk_out_1, clk_out_2, clk_out_3
>>>>>> with
>>>>>> mux and gate for each of these clocks.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Currently these PMC clocks are registered by Tegra clock driver
>>>>>> using
>>>>>> clk_register_mux and clk_register_gate by passing PMC base address
>>>>>> and register offsets and PMC programming for these clocks happens
>>>>>> through direct PMC access by the clock driver.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> With this, when PMC is in secure mode any direct PMC access from the
>>>>>> non-secure world does not go through and these clocks will not be
>>>>>> functional.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This patch adds these clocks registration with PMC as a clock
>>>>>> provider
>>>>>> for these clocks. clk_ops callback implementations for these clocks
>>>>>> uses tegra_pmc_readl and tegra_pmc_writel which supports PMC
>>>>>> programming
>>>>>> in secure mode and non-secure mode.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@nvidia.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>> [snip]
>>>>
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +static const struct clk_ops pmc_clk_gate_ops = {
>>>>>> +    .is_enabled = pmc_clk_is_enabled,
>>>>>> +    .enable = pmc_clk_enable,
>>>>>> +    .disable = pmc_clk_disable,
>>>>>> +};
>>>>> What's the benefit of separating GATE from the MUX?
>>>>>
>>>>> I think it could be a single clock.
>>>> According to TRM:
>>>>
>>>> 1. GATE and MUX are separate entities.
>>>>
>>>> 2. GATE is the parent of MUX (see PMC's CLK_OUT paths diagram in TRM).
>>>>
>>>> 3. PMC doesn't gate EXTPERIPH clock but could "force-enable" it,
>>>> correct?

Was following existing clk-tegra-pmc as I am not sure of reason for
having these clocks registered as separate mux and gate clocks.

Yes, PMC clocks can be registered as single clock and can use clk_ops
for set/get parent and enable/disable.

enable/disable of PMC clocks is for force-enable to force the clock to
run regardless of ACCEPT_REQ or INVERT_REQ.

>>> 4. clk_m_div2/4 are internal PMC OSC dividers and thus these clocks
>>> should belong to PMC.
>> Also, it should be "osc" and not "clk_m".
>
> I followed the same parents as it were in existing clk-tegra-pmc driver.
>
> Yeah they are wrong and they should be from osc and not clk_m.
>
> Will fix in next version.
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-12-07 22:37    [W:0.078 / U:10.036 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site