[lkml]   [2019]   [Dec]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH RFC 00/15] KVM: Dirty ring interface

On 2019/11/30 上午5:34, Peter Xu wrote:
> Branch is here:
> Overview
> ============
> This is a continued work from Lei Cao<> and Paolo
> on the KVM dirty ring interface. To make it simple, I'll still start
> with version 1 as RFC.
> The new dirty ring interface is another way to collect dirty pages for
> the virtual machine, but it is different from the existing dirty
> logging interface in a few ways, majorly:
> - Data format: The dirty data was in a ring format rather than a
> bitmap format, so the size of data to sync for dirty logging does
> not depend on the size of guest memory any more, but speed of
> dirtying. Also, the dirty ring is per-vcpu (currently plus
> another per-vm ring, so total ring number is N+1), while the dirty
> bitmap is per-vm.
> - Data copy: The sync of dirty pages does not need data copy any more,
> but instead the ring is shared between the userspace and kernel by
> page sharings (mmap() on either the vm fd or vcpu fd)
> - Interface: Instead of using the old KVM_GET_DIRTY_LOG,
> KVM_CLEAR_DIRTY_LOG interfaces, the new ring uses a new interface
> called KVM_RESET_DIRTY_RINGS when we want to reset the collected
> dirty pages to protected mode again (works like
> KVM_CLEAR_DIRTY_LOG, but ring based)
> And more.

Looks really interesting, I wonder if we can make this as a library then
we can reuse it for vhost.


 \ /
  Last update: 2019-12-04 11:41    [W:0.328 / U:0.084 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site