[lkml]   [2019]   [Dec]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 00/15] KVM: Dynamically size memslot arrays
On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 04:07:29PM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> The end goal of this series is to dynamically size the memslot array so
> that KVM allocates memory based on the number of memslots in use, as
> opposed to unconditionally allocating memory for the maximum number of
> memslots. On x86, each memslot consumes 88 bytes, and so with 2 address
> spaces of 512 memslots, each VM consumes ~90k bytes for the memslots.
> E.g. given a VM that uses a total of 30 memslots, dynamic sizing reduces
> the memory footprint from 90k to ~2.6k bytes.
> The changes required to support dynamic sizing are relatively small,
> e.g. are essentially contained in patches 14/15 and 15/15. Patches 1-13
> clean up the memslot code, which has gotten quite crusty, especially
> __kvm_set_memory_region(). The clean up is likely not strictly necessary
> to switch to dynamic sizing, but I didn't have a remotely reasonable
> level of confidence in the correctness of the dynamic sizing without first
> doing the clean up.
> Christoffer, I added your Tested-by to the patches that I was confident
> would be fully tested based on the desription of what you tested. Let me
> know if you disagree with any of 'em.
> v3:
> - Fix build errors on PPC and MIPS due to missed params during
> refactoring [kbuild test robot].
> - Rename the helpers for update_memslots() and add comments describing
> the new algorithm and how it interacts with searching [Paolo].
> - Remove the unnecessary and obnoxious warning regarding memslots being
> a flexible array [Paolo].
> - Fix typos in the changelog of patch 09/15 [Christoffer].
> - Collect tags [Christoffer].
> v2:
> - Split "Drop kvm_arch_create_memslot()" into three patches to move
> minor functional changes to standalone patches [Janosch].
> - Rebase to latest kvm/queue (f0574a1cea5b, "KVM: x86: fix ...")
> - Collect an Acked-by and a Reviewed-by

Paolo, do you want me to rebase this to the latest kvm/queue?

 \ /
  Last update: 2019-12-03 23:15    [W:0.127 / U:0.848 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site