Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Fri, 27 Dec 2019 11:37:32 +0000 | From | Chris Down <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] fs: inode: Recycle inodenum from volatile inode slabs |
| |
zhengbin (A) writes: >How about tmpfs and hugetlbfs use their own get_next_ino? like > >static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned int, tmpfs_last_ino), > >which can reduce the risk of 32 bit wraparound further.
This won't help by itself, because in the case presented the wraparound almost solely comes from shmem alone.
|  |