lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Dec]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH -next] powerpc/pmac/smp: Fix old-style declaration
YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com> a écrit :

> There expect the 'static' keyword to come first in a declaration
>
> arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/smp.c:664:1: warning: static is not
> at beginning of declaration [-Wold-style-declaration]
> arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/smp.c:665:1: warning: static is not
> at beginning of declaration [-Wold-style-declaration]
>
> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/smp.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/smp.c
> b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/smp.c
> index f95fbde..7233b85 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/smp.c
> @@ -661,8 +661,8 @@ static void smp_core99_gpio_tb_freeze(int freeze)
> #endif /* !CONFIG_PPC64 */
>
> /* L2 and L3 cache settings to pass from CPU0 to CPU1 on G4 cpus */
> -volatile static long int core99_l2_cache;
> -volatile static long int core99_l3_cache;
> +static volatile long int core99_l2_cache;
> +static volatile long int core99_l3_cache;

Is it correct to declare it as volatile ?

See
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/volatile-considered-harmful.html

Christophe

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-12-26 22:22    [W:0.062 / U:2.404 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site