lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Dec]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [Lima] [RFC v1 0/1] drm: lima: devfreq and cooling device support
From


于 2019年12月24日 GMT+08:00 下午7:28:41, Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> 写到:
>Hi Alyssa,
>
>On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 4:48 PM Alyssa Rosenzweig
><alyssa.rosenzweig@collabora.com> wrote:
>>
>> If so much code is being duplicated over, I'm wondering if it makes
>> sense for us to move some of the common devfreq code to core DRM
>> helpers?
>if you have any recommendation where to put it then please let me know
>(I am not familiar with the DRM subsystem at all)
>
>my initial idea was that the devfreq logic needs the same information
>that the scheduler needs (whether we're submitting something to be
>executed, there was a timeout, ...).
>however, looking at drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/ this seems pretty
>stand-alone so I'm not sure it should go there
>also the Mali-4x0 GPUs have some "PMU" which *may* be used instead of

It's optional. We cannot promise its existance on a given
hardware, and I heard that at least on Allwinner H5 Mali PMU
is broken.

>polling the statistics internally
>so this is where I realize that with my current knowledge I don't know
>enough about lima, panfrost, DRM or the devfreq subsystem to get a
>good idea where to put the code.
>
>
>Martin
>_______________________________________________
>lima mailing list
>lima@lists.freedesktop.org
>https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/lima

--
使用 K-9 Mail 发送自我的Android设备。

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-12-24 12:41    [W:0.040 / U:3.028 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site