lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Dec]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH RESEND] fs: use UB-safe check for signed addition overflow in remap_verify_area
On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 02:39:42PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
> The following warning pops up with enabled UBSAN in tests fstests/generic/303:
>
> [23127.529395] UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in fs/read_write.c:1725:7
> [23127.529400] signed integer overflow:
> [23127.529403] 4611686018427322368 + 9223372036854775807 cannot be represented in type 'long long int'
> [23127.529412] CPU: 4 PID: 26180 Comm: xfs_io Not tainted 5.2.0-rc2-1.ge195904-vanilla+ #450
> [23127.556999] Hardware name: empty empty/S3993, BIOS PAQEX0-3 02/24/2008
> [23127.557001] Call Trace:
> [23127.557060] dump_stack+0x67/0x9b
> [23127.557070] ubsan_epilogue+0x9/0x40
> [23127.573496] handle_overflow+0xb3/0xc0
> [23127.573514] do_clone_file_range+0x28f/0x2a0
> [23127.573547] vfs_clone_file_range+0x35/0xb0
> [23127.573564] ioctl_file_clone+0x8d/0xc0
> [23127.590144] do_vfs_ioctl+0x300/0x700
> [23127.590160] ksys_ioctl+0x70/0x80
> [23127.590203] ? trace_hardirqs_off_thunk+0x1a/0x1c
> [23127.590210] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
> [23127.590215] do_syscall_64+0x5c/0x1d0
> [23127.590224] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
> [23127.590231] RIP: 0033:0x7ff6d7250327
> [23127.590241] RSP: 002b:00007ffe3a38f1d8 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
> [23127.590246] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000004 RCX: 00007ff6d7250327
> [23127.590249] RDX: 00007ffe3a38f220 RSI: 000000004020940d RDI: 0000000000000003
> [23127.590252] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 00007ffe3a3c80a0 R09: 00007ffe3a3c8080
> [23127.590255] R10: 000000000fa99fa0 R11: 0000000000000206 R12: 0000000000000000
> [23127.590260] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 3fffffffffff0000 R15: 00007ff6d750a20c
>
> As loff_t is a signed type, we should use the safe overflow checks
> instead of relying on compiler implementation.
>
> The bogus values are intentional and the test is supposed to verify the
> boundary conditions.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-12-22 06:30    [W:0.036 / U:30.448 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site