lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Dec]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 0/5] sched/fair: Task placement biasing using uclamp
On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 04:06:38PM +0100, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> On 11/12/2019 12:38, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > While uclamp restrictions currently only impact schedutil's frequency
> > selection, it would make sense to also let them impact CPU selection in
> > asymmetric topologies. This would let us steer specific tasks towards
> > certain CPU capacities regardless of their actual utilization - I give a
> > few examples in patch 4.
> >
> > The first three patches are mainly cleanups, the meat of the thing is
> > in patches 4 and 5.
> >
> > Note that this is in the same spirit as what Patrick had proposed for EAS
> > on Android [1]
> >
> > [1]: https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/common/+/b61876ed122f816660fe49e0de1b7ee4891deaa2%5E%21
>
> Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
> Tested-By: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>

Thanks!

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-12-20 16:04    [W:0.061 / U:1.780 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site