lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Dec]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/5] firmware: xilinx: Adds new eemi call for reg access
On Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 03:29:15PM -0800, Jolly Shah wrote:
> From: Rajan Vaja <rajan.vaja@xilinx.com>
>
> This patch adds new EEMI call which is used for CSU/PMU register
> access from linux.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rajan Vaja <rajan.vaja@xilinx.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jolly Shah <jolly.shah@xilinx.com>
> ---
> drivers/firmware/xilinx/zynqmp.c | 183 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/firmware/xlnx-zynqmp.h | 9 ++
> 2 files changed, 192 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/xilinx/zynqmp.c b/drivers/firmware/xilinx/zynqmp.c
> index fd3d837..56431ad 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/xilinx/zynqmp.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/xilinx/zynqmp.c
> @@ -24,6 +24,8 @@
> #include <linux/firmware/xlnx-zynqmp.h>
> #include "zynqmp-debug.h"
>
> +static unsigned long register_address;
> +
> static const struct zynqmp_eemi_ops *eemi_ops_tbl;
>
> static const struct mfd_cell firmware_devs[] = {
> @@ -664,6 +666,26 @@ static int zynqmp_pm_set_requirement(const u32 node, const u32 capabilities,
> qos, ack, NULL);
> }
>
> +/**
> + * zynqmp_pm_config_reg_access - PM Config API for Config register access
> + * @register_access_id: ID of the requested REGISTER_ACCESS
> + * @address: Address of the register to be accessed
> + * @mask: Mask to be written to the register
> + * @value: Value to be written to the register
> + * @out: Returned output value
> + *
> + * This function calls REGISTER_ACCESS to configure CSU/PMU registers.
> + *
> + * Return: Returns status, either success or error+reason
> + */
> +
> +static int zynqmp_pm_config_reg_access(u32 register_access_id, u32 address,
> + u32 mask, u32 value, u32 *out)
> +{
> + return zynqmp_pm_invoke_fn(PM_REGISTER_ACCESS, register_access_id,
> + address, mask, value, out);
> +}
> +

If you have this API, can you remove all other APIs and implement them
using these ? This kills the EEMI abstraction.

NACK for this and any attempts to provide direct reas/write access to
the PM config space. EEMI should have better abstraction than this.

--
Regards,
Sudeep

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-12-18 15:55    [W:0.097 / U:10.432 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site