lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Dec]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH v2 09/11] devfreq: exynos-bus: Add interconnect functionality to exynos-bus
Hi,

2019년 12월 18일 (수) 오후 7:19, Artur Świgoń <a.swigon@samsung.com>님이 작성:
>
> Hi,
>
> Thank you for the review.
>
> On Mon, 2019-12-16 at 09:44 +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 9/19/19 11:22 PM, Artur Świgoń wrote:
> > > From: Artur Świgoń <a.swigon@partner.samsung.com>
> > >
> > > This patch adds interconnect functionality to the exynos-bus devfreq
> > > driver.
> > >
> > > The SoC topology is a graph (or, more specifically, a tree) and most of
> > > its edges are taken from the devfreq parent-child hierarchy (cf.
> > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/devfreq/exynos-bus.txt). Due to
> > > unspecified relative probing order, -EPROBE_DEFER may be propagated to
> > > guarantee that a child is probed before its parent.
> > >
> > > Each bus is now an interconnect provider and an interconnect node as well
> > > (cf. Documentation/interconnect/interconnect.rst), i.e. every bus registers
> > > itself as a node. Node IDs are not hardcoded but rather assigned at
> > > runtime, in probing order (subject to the above-mentioned exception
> > > regarding relative order). This approach allows for using this driver with
> > > various Exynos SoCs.
> > >
> > > Frequencies requested via the interconnect API for a given node are
> > > propagated to devfreq using dev_pm_qos_update_request(). Please note that
> > > it is not an error when CONFIG_INTERCONNECT is 'n', in which case all
> > > interconnect API functions are no-op.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Artur Świgoń <a.swigon@partner.samsung.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c | 153 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 153 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c b/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
> > > index 8d44810cac69..e0232202720d 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
> > > @@ -14,14 +14,19 @@
> > > #include <linux/devfreq-event.h>
> > > #include <linux/device.h>
> > > #include <linux/export.h>
> > > +#include <linux/idr.h>
> > > +#include <linux/interconnect-provider.h>
> > > #include <linux/module.h>
> > > #include <linux/of.h>
> > > #include <linux/pm_opp.h>
> > > +#include <linux/pm_qos.h>
> > > #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > > #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
> > >
> > > #define DEFAULT_SATURATION_RATIO 40
> > >
> > > +#define icc_units_to_khz(x) ((x) / 8)
> >
> > icc_units_to_khz() -> kpbs_to_khz()
>
> OK
>
> > > +
> > > struct exynos_bus {
> > > struct device *dev;
> > >
> > > @@ -35,6 +40,12 @@ struct exynos_bus {
> > > struct opp_table *opp_table;
> > > struct clk *clk;
> > > unsigned int ratio;
> > > +
> > > + /* One provider per bus, one node per provider */
> > > + struct icc_provider provider;
> > > + struct icc_node *node;
> > > +
> > > + struct dev_pm_qos_request qos_req;
> > > };
> > >
> > > /*
> > > @@ -59,6 +70,13 @@ exynos_bus_ops_edev(enable_edev);
> > > exynos_bus_ops_edev(disable_edev);
> > > exynos_bus_ops_edev(set_event);
> > >
> > > +static int exynos_bus_next_id(void)
> > > +{
> > > + static DEFINE_IDA(exynos_bus_icc_ida);
> > > +
> > > + return ida_alloc(&exynos_bus_icc_ida, GFP_KERNEL);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > static int exynos_bus_get_event(struct exynos_bus *bus,
> > > struct devfreq_event_data *edata)
> > > {
> > > @@ -171,6 +189,38 @@ static void exynos_bus_passive_exit(struct device *dev)
> > > clk_disable_unprepare(bus->clk);
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static int exynos_bus_icc_set(struct icc_node *src, struct icc_node *dst)
> > > +{
> > > + struct exynos_bus *src_bus = src->data, *dst_bus = dst->data;
> > > + s32 src_freq = icc_units_to_khz(src->avg_bw);
> > > + s32 dst_freq = icc_units_to_khz(dst->avg_bw);
> > > +
> > > + dev_pm_qos_update_request(&src_bus->qos_req, src_freq);
> >
> > Have to check the return value.
> > If return error, show the waring with dev_warn.
>
> OK, I will change it to:
>
> ret = dev_pm_qos_update_request(&src_bus->qos_req, src_freq);
> if (ret < 0) {
> dev_warn(src_bus->dev, "failed to update PM QoS request");
> return ret;

If you return right after, better to use dev_err.
If you use dev_warn, just show the warning message without return.

> }
>
> > > + dev_pm_qos_update_request(&dst_bus->qos_req, dst_freq);
> >
> > ditto.
>
> OK (same as above).

ditto.

>
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int exynos_bus_icc_aggregate(struct icc_node *node, u32 tag, u32 avg_bw,
> > > + u32 peak_bw, u32 *agg_avg, u32 *agg_peak)
> > > +{
> > > + *agg_avg += avg_bw;
> > > + *agg_peak = max(*agg_peak, peak_bw);
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static struct icc_node *exynos_bus_icc_xlate(struct of_phandle_args *spec,
> > > + void *data)
> > > +{
> > > + struct exynos_bus *bus = data;
> > > +
> > > + if (spec->np != bus->dev->of_node)
> > > + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> > > +
> > > + return bus->node;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > static int exynos_bus_parent_parse_of(struct device_node *np,
> > > struct exynos_bus *bus)
> > > {
> > > @@ -366,6 +416,101 @@ static int exynos_bus_profile_init_passive(struct exynos_bus *bus,
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static int exynos_bus_icc_connect(struct exynos_bus *bus)
> > > +{
> > > + struct device_node *np = bus->dev->of_node;
> > > + struct devfreq *parent_devfreq;
> > > + struct icc_node *parent_node = NULL;
> > > + struct of_phandle_args args;
> > > + int ret = 0;
> > > +
> > > + parent_devfreq = devfreq_get_devfreq_by_phandle(bus->dev, 0);
> > > + if (!IS_ERR(parent_devfreq)) {
> > > + struct exynos_bus *parent_bus;
> > > +
> > > + parent_bus = dev_get_drvdata(parent_devfreq->dev.parent);
> > > + parent_node = parent_bus->node;
> > > + } else {
> > > + /* Look for parent in DT */
> > > + int num = of_count_phandle_with_args(np, "parent",
> > > + "#interconnect-cells");
> > > + if (num != 1)
> > > + goto out; /* 'parent' is optional */
> > > +
> > > + ret = of_parse_phandle_with_args(np, "parent",
> > > + "#interconnect-cells",
> > > + 0, &args);
> >
> >
> > Actually, I agree your approach. I think that it is very useful
> > and necessary to guarantee the PM QoS requirements between devices.
> >
> > But,
> > As I already commented, I'm not sure that the "parent" property
> > is proper for only this driver. If possible, you better to get
> > the parent phandle through other way like OF graph.
> >
> > If you suggest the standard way to make the tree between
> > the exynos-bus, I'll agree.
>
> As I commented in the answer to patch 08, I will use the
> 'exynos,interconnect-parent-node' property for bus_display,
> bus_leftbus and bus_dmc.

OK.

>
> > Also, for interconnect path, you have to add the connection
> > between 'bus_display' and 'bus_leftbus' regardless
> > of the existing 'devfreq' property.
> > - bus_display - bus_leftbus - bus_dmc
> >
> > > + if (ret < 0)
> > > + goto out;
> > > +
> > > + of_node_put(args.np);
> > > +
> > > + parent_node = of_icc_get_from_provider(&args);
> > > + if (IS_ERR(parent_node)) {
> > > + /* May be -EPROBE_DEFER */
> > > + ret = PTR_ERR(parent_node);
> > > + goto out;
> > > + }
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + ret = icc_link_create(bus->node, parent_node->id);
> > > +
> > > +out:
> > > + return ret;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int exynos_bus_icc_init(struct exynos_bus *bus)
> > > +{
> > > + struct device *dev = bus->dev;
> > > + struct icc_provider *provider = &bus->provider;
> > > + struct icc_node *node;
> > > + int id, ret;
> > > +
> > > + /* Initialize the interconnect provider */
> > > + provider->set = exynos_bus_icc_set;
> > > + provider->aggregate = exynos_bus_icc_aggregate;
> > > + provider->xlate = exynos_bus_icc_xlate;
> > > + provider->dev = dev;
> > > + provider->data = bus;
> > > +
> > > + ret = icc_provider_add(provider);
> > > + if (ret < 0)
> > > + goto out;
> >
> > Return error without goto because there is no any requirement
> > to free the resource before.
>
> OK.
>
> > > +
> > > + ret = id = exynos_bus_next_id();
> > > + if (ret < 0)
> > > + goto err_node;
> > > +
> > > + node = icc_node_create(id);
> > > + if (IS_ERR(node)) {
> > > + ret = PTR_ERR(node);
> > > + goto err_node;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + bus->node = node;
> > > + node->name = dev->of_node->name;
> > > + node->data = bus;
> > > + icc_node_add(node, provider);
> > > +
> > > + ret = exynos_bus_icc_connect(bus);
> > > + if (ret < 0)
> > > + goto err_connect;
> > > +
> > > + ret = dev_pm_qos_add_request(bus->devfreq->dev.parent, &bus->qos_req,
> >
> > Check whether this line is over 80 char.
>
> It looks like 77 columns to me.
>
> >
> > > + DEV_PM_QOS_MIN_FREQUENCY, 0);
> >
> > Check the return value.
>
> OK.
>
> >
> > > +
> > > +out:
> >
> > Remove this goto due to not necessary.
> >
> > > + return ret;
> >
> > return 0;
>
> OK.
>
> Please also note that this function as well as exynos_bus_icc_connect()
> will
> slightly change in v3 due to the changes regarding DT properties.
>
> >
> > > +
> > > +err_connect:
> > > + icc_node_del(node);
> > > + icc_node_destroy(id);
> > > +err_node:
> > > + icc_provider_del(provider);
> > > +
> > > + return ret;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > static int exynos_bus_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > {
> > > struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > > @@ -415,6 +560,14 @@ static int exynos_bus_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > if (ret < 0)
> > > goto err;
> > >
> > > + /*
> > > + * Initialize interconnect provider. A return value of -ENOTSUPP means
> > > + * that CONFIG_INTERCONNECT is disabled.
> > > + */
> > > + ret = exynos_bus_icc_init(bus);
> > > + if (ret < 0 && ret != -ENOTSUPP)
> > > + goto err;
> >
> > Print error message.
> > dev_err(dev, "failed to initialize the interconnect provider");
>
> OK.
>
> >
> > > +
> > > max_state = bus->devfreq->profile->max_state;
> > > min_freq = (bus->devfreq->profile->freq_table[0] / 1000);
> > > max_freq = (bus->devfreq->profile->freq_table[max_state - 1] / 1000);
> > >
> >
> >
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Artur Świgoń
> Samsung R&D Institute Poland
> Samsung Electronics
>
>


--
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-12-18 11:43    [W:0.081 / U:0.088 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site