lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Dec]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] nvmem: add QTI SDAM driver
On Tue 17 Dec 01:20 PST 2019, Shyam Kumar Thella wrote:

> QTI SDAM driver allows PMIC peripherals to access the shared memory
> that is available on QTI PMICs.
>
> Change-Id: I40005646ab1fbba9e0e4aa68e0a61cfbc7b51ba6

No Change-Id upstream please.

> Signed-off-by: Shyam Kumar Thella <sthella@codeaurora.org>
[..]
> diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/qcom-spmi-sdam.c b/drivers/nvmem/qcom-spmi-sdam.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..e80a446
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/nvmem/qcom-spmi-sdam.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,197 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2017 The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/device.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
> +#include <linux/nvmem-provider.h>
> +#include <linux/regmap.h>
> +
> +#define SDAM_MEM_START 0x40
> +#define REGISTER_MAP_ID 0x40
> +#define REGISTER_MAP_VERSION 0x41
> +#define SDAM_SIZE 0x44
> +#define SDAM_PBS_TRIG_SET 0xE5
> +#define SDAM_PBS_TRIG_CLR 0xE6
> +
> +struct sdam_chip {
> + struct platform_device *pdev;

As written right now, pdev is unused. But if you stash struct device *
here instead you can replace your pr_err() with dev_err() using this,
for better error messages.

> + struct regmap *regmap;
> + int base;

This would look better as a unsigned int.

> + int size;

Ditto, or perhaps even size_t.

> +};
> +
> +/* read only register offsets */
> +static const u8 sdam_ro_map[] = {
> + REGISTER_MAP_ID,
> + REGISTER_MAP_VERSION,
> + SDAM_SIZE
> +};
> +
> +static bool is_valid(struct sdam_chip *sdam, unsigned int offset, size_t len)

Please do prefix this with "sdam_"

> +{
> + int sdam_mem_end = SDAM_MEM_START + sdam->size - 1;
> +
> + if (!len)
> + return false;
> +
> + if (offset >= SDAM_MEM_START && offset <= sdam_mem_end
> + && (offset + len - 1) <= sdam_mem_end)
> + return true;
> + else if ((offset == SDAM_PBS_TRIG_SET || offset == SDAM_PBS_TRIG_CLR)
> + && (len == 1))
> + return true;
> +
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> +static bool is_ro(unsigned int offset, size_t len)

Ditto

> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(sdam_ro_map); i++)
> + if (offset <= sdam_ro_map[i] && (offset + len) > sdam_ro_map[i])
> + return true;
> +
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> +static int sdam_read(void *priv, unsigned int offset, void *val, size_t bytes)
> +{
> + struct sdam_chip *sdam = priv;
> + int rc;
> +
> + if (!is_valid(sdam, offset, bytes)) {
> + pr_err("Invalid SDAM offset 0x%02x len=%zd\n", offset, bytes);

Use %#x instead of 0x%02x

> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + rc = regmap_bulk_read(sdam->regmap, sdam->base + offset, val, bytes);
> + if (rc < 0)
> + pr_err("Failed to read SDAM offset 0x%02x len=%zd, rc=%d\n",
> + offset, bytes, rc);
> +
> + return rc;
> +}
> +
> +static int sdam_write(void *priv, unsigned int offset, void *val, size_t bytes)
> +{
> + struct sdam_chip *sdam = priv;
> + int rc;
> +
> + if (!is_valid(sdam, offset, bytes)) {
> + pr_err("Invalid SDAM offset 0x%02x len=%zd\n", offset, bytes);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + if (is_ro(offset, bytes)) {
> + pr_err("Invalid write offset 0x%02x len=%zd\n", offset, bytes);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + rc = regmap_bulk_write(sdam->regmap, sdam->base + offset, val, bytes);
> + if (rc < 0)
> + pr_err("Failed to write SDAM offset 0x%02x len=%zd, rc=%d\n",
> + offset, bytes, rc);
> +
> + return rc;
> +}
> +
> +static int sdam_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct sdam_chip *sdam;
> + struct nvmem_device *nvmem;
> + struct nvmem_config *sdam_config;
> + unsigned int val = 0;

No need to initialize this.

> + int rc;
> +
> + sdam = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*sdam), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!sdam)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + sdam_config = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*sdam_config),
> + GFP_KERNEL);

Can't this be included in struct sdam_chip, for a single allocation?

> + if (!sdam_config)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + sdam->regmap = dev_get_regmap(pdev->dev.parent, NULL);
> + if (!sdam->regmap) {
> + pr_err("Failed to get regmap handle\n");

dev_err(&pdev->dev, ...);

> + return -ENXIO;
> + }
> +
> + rc = of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node, "reg", &sdam->base);

In other words, base must be u32.

> + if (rc < 0) {
> + pr_err("Failed to get SDAM base, rc=%d\n", rc);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + rc = regmap_read(sdam->regmap, sdam->base + SDAM_SIZE, &val);
> + if (rc < 0) {
> + pr_err("Failed to read SDAM_SIZE rc=%d\n", rc);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + sdam->size = val * 32;
> +
> + sdam_config->dev = &pdev->dev;
> + sdam_config->name = "spmi_sdam";
> + sdam_config->id = pdev->id;
> + sdam_config->owner = THIS_MODULE,
> + sdam_config->stride = 1;
> + sdam_config->word_size = 1;
> + sdam_config->reg_read = sdam_read;
> + sdam_config->reg_write = sdam_write;
> + sdam_config->priv = sdam;
> +
> + nvmem = nvmem_register(sdam_config);
> + if (IS_ERR(nvmem)) {
> + pr_err("Failed to register SDAM nvmem device rc=%ld\n",
> + PTR_ERR(nvmem));
> + return -ENXIO;
> + }
> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, nvmem);
> +
> + pr_info("SDAM base=0x%04x size=%d registered successfully\n",
> + sdam->base, sdam->size);

Please don't print notifications in the kernel log. You can possibly use
dev_dbg(). Or just look for devices in
/sys/bus/platform/drivers/qcom,spmi-sdam/

> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int sdam_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)

Instead of using nvmem_register(), use devm_nvmem_register() and just
omit the remote function completely - which also allows you to drop the
platform_set_drvdata() above.

> +{
> + struct nvmem_device *nvmem = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +
> + return nvmem_unregister(nvmem);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id sdam_match_table[] = {
> + {.compatible = "qcom,spmi-sdam"},

Please add a space after { and before }.

> + {},
> +};
> +
> +static struct platform_driver sdam_driver = {
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "qcom,spmi-sdam",
> + .of_match_table = sdam_match_table,
> + },
> + .probe = sdam_probe,
> + .remove = sdam_remove,
> +};
> +
> +static int __init sdam_init(void)
> +{
> + return platform_driver_register(&sdam_driver);
> +}
> +subsys_initcall(sdam_init);

module_platform_driver(sdam_driver), unless you have some strong
arguments for why this needs to be subsys_initcall

Regards,
Bjorn

> +
> +static void __exit sdam_exit(void)
> +{
> + return platform_driver_unregister(&sdam_driver);
> +}
> +module_exit(sdam_exit);
> +
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("QCOM SPMI SDAM driver");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> --
> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
> a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-12-18 07:14    [W:0.053 / U:14.824 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site