lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Dec]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH RFC 04/15] KVM: Implement ring-based dirty memory tracking
From
Date
On 17/12/19 16:38, Peter Xu wrote:
> There's still time to persuade me to going back to it. :)
>
> (Though, yes I still like current solution... if we can get rid of the
> only kvmgt ugliness, we can even throw away the per-vm ring with its
> "extra" 4k page. Then I suppose it'll be even harder to persuade me :)

Actually that's what convinced me in the first place, so let's
absolutely get rid of both the per-VM ring and the union. Kevin and
Alex have answered and everybody seems to agree.

Paolo

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-12-17 17:32    [W:0.131 / U:19.992 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site