lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Dec]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH 1/2] mm/mmu_gather: Invalidate TLB correctly on batch allocation failure and flush
On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 04:18:40PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> On 12/17/19 2:39 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 12:47:12PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> > > Architectures for which we have hardware walkers of Linux page table should
> > > flush TLB on mmu gather batch allocation failures and batch flush. Some
> > > architectures like POWER supports multiple translation modes (hash and radix)
> > > and in the case of POWER only radix translation mode needs the above TLBI.
> > > This is because for hash translation mode kernel wants to avoid this extra
> > > flush since there are no hardware walkers of linux page table. With radix
> > > translation, the hardware also walks linux page table and with that, kernel
> > > needs to make sure to TLB invalidate page walk cache before page table pages are
> > > freed.
> >
> > > Based on changes from Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> >
> > AFAICT it is all my patch ;-)
>
> Yes. I moved the changes you had to upstream. I can update the From: in the
> next version if you are ok with that?

Well, since PPC isn't broken per finding the invalidate in
__p*_free_tlb(), lets do these things on top of the patches I proposed
here. Also, you mnight want to run benchmarks to see if the movement of
that TLBI actually helps (I'm thinking the cost of the PTESYNC might add
up).

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-12-17 13:50    [W:0.045 / U:3.428 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site