[lkml]   [2019]   [Dec]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] sched/fair: Do not set skip buddy up the sched hierarchy
On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 11:58:28AM -0800, Josh Don wrote:
> > Ingo, Peter, what do you think ?
> I could add the Co-developed-by tag if that would be sufficient here.
> As a side note, I'm also looking at upstreaming our other sched
> fixes/patches, and some of these have the same issue with respect to
> the original author. How would you prefer I handle these in general?

These internal patches that you have, don't they have a SoB on from the
original author?

Ingo, Greg, how do we handle patches where the original Author has
vanished/left etc and no SoB is present?

Now, in this case we know Venki was with Google in the US, and the US
allows/has copyright assignment to employers and therefore any old SoB
from a Google person should probably be sufficient, but that argument
doesn't work in general (Germany for example doesn't allow copyright

 \ /
  Last update: 2019-12-17 21:43    [W:0.088 / U:0.148 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site