lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Dec]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] sched/fair: Do not set skip buddy up the sched hierarchy
On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 12:05 AM Vincent Guittot
<vincent.guittot@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Josh,
>
> On Fri, 6 Dec 2019 at 23:13, Josh Don <joshdon@google.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Vincent,
> >
> > Thanks for taking a look.
> >
> > > There is a mismatch between the author Venkatesh Pallipadi and the
> > > signoff Josh Don
> > > If Venkatesh is the original author and you have then done some
> > > modifications, your both signed-off should be there
> >
> > Venkatesh no longer works at Google, so I don't have a way to get in
> > touch with him. Is my signed-off insufficient for this case?
>
> Maybe you can add a Co-developed-by tag to reflect your additional changes
> I guess that as long as you agree with the DCO, it's ok :
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.4/process/submitting-patches.html#sign-your-work-the-developer-s-certificate-of-origin
>
> Ingo, Peter, what do you think ?

I could add the Co-developed-by tag if that would be sufficient here.
As a side note, I'm also looking at upstreaming our other sched
fixes/patches, and some of these have the same issue with respect to
the original author. How would you prefer I handle these in general?

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-12-17 20:59    [W:0.066 / U:29.756 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site