Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Mon, 16 Dec 2019 17:25:36 +0000 | From | Mark Brown <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/1] regulator: of: Does always-on imply on-in-suspend? |
| |
On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 06:06:20PM +0100, Robert Karszniewicz wrote: > Hi all. > > Just to make sure; the oftree property regulator-always-on implies that for > every suspend state, the property regulator-on-in-suspend is implicit? With no > other side-effect? Reading the documentation, this is what I interpret.
Please don't send cover letters for single patches, if there is anything that needs saying put it in the changelog of the patch or after the --- if it's administrative stuff. This reduces mail volume and ensures that any important information is recorded in the changelog rather than being lost. [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] |  |