[lkml]   [2019]   [Dec]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/1] regulator: of: Does always-on imply on-in-suspend?
On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 06:06:20PM +0100, Robert Karszniewicz wrote:
> Hi all.
> Just to make sure; the oftree property regulator-always-on implies that for
> every suspend state, the property regulator-on-in-suspend is implicit? With no
> other side-effect? Reading the documentation, this is what I interpret.

Please don't send cover letters for single patches, if there is anything
that needs saying put it in the changelog of the patch or after the ---
if it's administrative stuff. This reduces mail volume and ensures that
any important information is recorded in the changelog rather than being
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-12-16 18:26    [W:0.034 / U:0.624 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site